The alcohol impairment in anyone does not just begin at the legal limit. As I have already stated ... being under the influence and over the the limit are two entirely different things.
I recall a "Memorial Ride" quite a few years back ... for a club president that died (in a non motorcycle accident). I was previously a member of that club ... and had done that ride on a few occasions. Stops were planned at pubs ... and in between those were stops at various scenic spots for a "Top-up" from their own "bring your own" supply. I don't drink and ride so I stopped doing the run.
A few years later the run was done and one rider showed up with a borrowed bike (with no WOF) ... wife on the back. About half way ... he got into the gravel on the left and lost control.
Wife died. Kids lost their mother.
Was breath tested and was under the limit.
Aside from the fact he didn't have a license ... he had been drinking and would have had some impairment with his riding.
Being legal and being entirely safe ... are not necessarily the same things.
The debate on a zero limit is a personal issue for most ... and regardless how many times anybody has ridden after drinking alcohol ... under the limit or not ... one day there may be an extra factor in the accident you are involved in. At fault (ie:your fuck-up that instigated the mess) or not ... you might need all the time you have to make decisions that might save your's and/or a loved one's life.
A lost half second or two can and has made differences MANY have regretted for the rest of their lives.
Thought for the day ... does being LEGAL also ALWAYS mean NOT (even partially) at fault ... ???
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
I have had 37 years of riding bikes, driving cars, excavators, materials handlers, trucks and various other bits of machinery with two arms and legs. I have also had three years of driving cars (and have ridden bikes on occasion) missing one leg so I think I am qualified to comment unlike some that make assumptions based on half the knowledge.
A car fitted out appropriately for the disability, driven by the person it is fitted out for, means you have no less ability than anyone else.
Science Is But An Organized System Of Ignorance"Pornography: The thing with billions of views that nobody watches" - WhiteManBehindADesk
Got a mate in a wheelchair(electric) so far have converted a 2nd transit van, canam side by side and flat bottom lake boat for him, handles them as well
as anyone ,oh and the 2nd Transits repowered with a blown 351, 395kw, 800nm and 500kgs of wheelchair hoist gear definitely gets the power to the ground.
His attitude is most most things are just an engineering challenge waiting to be solved, fucking awsome!
Political Correctness, the chief weapon of whiney arse bastards
While not completely relevant to the topic the thought process is similar.
Y'all will be aware there has been a major drama with some drones causing major delays at Gatwick airport in the UK. There was an article in The Guardian postulating that the answer to the problem was tougher regulations for drone users. Apparently it has escaped their notice that the person or persons responsible were completely ignoring all of the the existing regulations. So no change to the regulations could reasonably be assumed to have any effect whatsoever.
Some journalists get their money too easily.
There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop
I would have thought you might have noticed a similar situation ... when with the toughening of the gun laws (anywhere) ... people still die from firearms.
However ... drinking alcohol and riding/driving while under the legal limit ... might be deemed unwise by some (me included) ... but totally within the law.
How would you think the cops feel ... when some turkey kills somebody's loved one (sometimes theirs) in/on their (or another) vehicle on the road ... gets a positive reading in the breath test ... and they then have to let them walk. Then the public social media outcry when they read about it in the papers ...
But ... tougher rules and penalties may encourage the same (or at least some) turkeys ... to not repeat it ... or (in reality) it may change nothing.
But public vote seekers will want to try (public hero and all that). I'm guessing the suggestion of rule tightening in this regard ... will be raised.
When life throws you a curve ... Lean into it ...
Recent US paper on lower blood alcohol limits. Report summary and conclusions
are in the first link.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...22437506000478
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journa...vol/37/issue/3
If you really want to read the full paper, you'll have to use the second link and
purchase a copy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks