Hi everyone,
I am a little bit curious, what are the reasons why some bikes have inverted front forks? Are there any benefits with regards to handling etc? Or is it just bike manufactures trying to be different?
Thanks,
Stefan
Hi everyone,
I am a little bit curious, what are the reasons why some bikes have inverted front forks? Are there any benefits with regards to handling etc? Or is it just bike manufactures trying to be different?
Thanks,
Stefan
It reduces unsuspended weight...... which helps with corners...... and stuff
I suffer from hooliganism.... Know me before you judge me
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...7&postcount=83
i need to practice my "this shit doesn't burn" faceWelcome, ZorsT.
You last visited: 1st November 2007 at 22:15
Inverted forks are generally a lot more stiffer due to be significantly thicker. The slider (narrower part) is a lot shorter then normal ones.
This aids in deflecting or twisting less under braking in racing conditions.
My 2c worth.
![]()
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
REALLY , WHEN I SPLIT THE FORKS THE STEEL BITS FELT HEAVIER TO ME THAN THE ALUMINIUM BITS .Originally Posted by GoodAndSuchLike
UPSIDE DOWN FORKS ARE USUALLY STIFFER
Yeah. They're stronger. And you need inverted oil to stop them leaking...
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
That's oil with bubbles at the bottom,. ay.....Originally Posted by Hitcher
"...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."
whoops, my badOriginally Posted by WINJA
I suffer from hooliganism.... Know me before you judge me
http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...7&postcount=83
i need to practice my "this shit doesn't burn" faceWelcome, ZorsT.
You last visited: 1st November 2007 at 22:15
As everyone says - stiffness. I have a problem with flex on my 600 using RSU forks. Sometimes under a decent amount of braking the forks bend far enough back that the wheel almost hits the headers. Pain in the ass.
The contents of this post are my opinion and may not be subjected to any form of reality
It means I'm not an authority or a teacher, and may not have any experience so take things with a pinch of salt (a.k.a bullshit) rather than fact
A GOOD FORK BRACE CAN STOP THEM WALKINGOriginally Posted by TwoSeven
I was explained it like this..
Think of a normal shock like a long fishing rod. If ya hold it by the thin end and get someone to give it a jiggle it wobbles a lot in your hands but if you hold it by the thick end the vibrations are well reduced to almost nothing.
So, it all depends on what end you want to stay still and what end you want to jiggle.. handle bars vs the wheel. That's why dirt bikes had upside down shocks first, the wheel had enough give to find its own grip.
Anyways...dunno if that makes sense to you, it doesn't to me when I re-read it.
I hear upright shocks are easier to make / service.
And water floats on it, I hear...Originally Posted by nudemetalz
Motorbike Camping for the win!
It's a fashion. Independent bikie type testers claim no difference in handling to rightwayupforks, alledgedly.
This weeks international insult is in Malayalam:
Thavalayolee
You Frog Fucker
Exteranly tunable can be built in to any forks, I'd go for fashion as Biff saidOriginally Posted by cowpoos
(much as I hate to agree with anything he says)
the main reason is Bling factor to help sales.
"See, my bike is better than my neighbour's uncle's"
While doing that, they also discover extra stiffness.
"My stiffy is bigger than yours"
The bad thing is, if you smack your bike to something, the frame (in particular, the steering head part) is more likely to take a bend because the impact got transmitted to it instead of being soaked by normal fork which acts as a crumple zone......imagine, your fork crumpling....![]()
Elite Fight Club - Proudly promoting common sense and safe riding since 2024
http://1199s.wordpress.com
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks