
Originally Posted by
neels
There seems to be a focus in that video on the fact that people with more fuel efficient cars will end up paying more, and that it's somehow unfair.
If you're driving your car on the road, it's causing some degree of degradation of that road regardless of how much fuel it's using to do that, so it doesn't seem unreasonable that the contribution to roading costs is based on how far you drive not how much fuel you use while doing so.
The argument that it reduces the incentive to drive more efficient cars doesn't really stack up, given that fuel levy (+GST) is around 1/3 of the cost of petrol, the other 2/3 of the cost is reason enough to drive something more efficient if you want to pay less to get from A to B.
There seem to be a lot of suggestions for other add-ons to RUC charging which has the potential to open a lot of doors for other charges and potential for spectacular cockups in the implementation, the current system seems to work pretty well for diesels and EVs, the simple answer would seem to be to just do that. If your RUCs aren't up to date you don't get a WOF, sure there will be some people who will try to fiddle the system or already don't care if their vehicle is legal, but the majority will just take the easiest route of paying what they're supposed to and the government will get the money they want.
Bookmarks