Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: New drug testing for road users

  1. #31
    Join Date
    25th June 2012 - 11:56
    Bike
    Daelim VL250 Daystar
    Location
    Pyongyang
    Posts
    2,697
    The true real unrealised danger on road

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/3609...yapping-my-ear

    Perhaps at roadside test if wifey is present a test should be carried out to see how long she can stay silent lol

    Kudos to the guy for his honesty in sharing the vid.
    Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer

  2. #32
    Join Date
    15th February 2005 - 15:34
    Bike
    Katanasaurus Rex
    Location
    The Gates of Delirium
    Posts
    9,022
    The taking of DNA samples (and what happens with them afterwards) is strictly regulated by the Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Act.

    Roadside drug testing comes under the Land Transport Act which has none of the strict regulations regarding the taking and usage of DNA samples.

    As a sovereign free being, that will be the basis of my refusal to provide a sample.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    25th June 2012 - 11:56
    Bike
    Daelim VL250 Daystar
    Location
    Pyongyang
    Posts
    2,697
    Quote Originally Posted by Katman View Post
    The taking of DNA samples (and what happens with them afterwards) is strictly regulated by the Criminal Investigations (Bodily Samples) Act.

    Roadside drug testing comes under the Land Transport Act which has none of the strict regulations regarding the taking and usage of DNA samples.

    As a sovereign free being, that will be the basis of my refusal to provide a sample.
    Good luck with that, it’s 75 demerit points to refuse the new roadside test.

    I also disagree with govt obtaining DNA samples from innocent people but the reality is they don’t have the funding, manpower or infrastructure systems in place for mass sample storage.
    The couldn’t even keep the covid testing records which would have been of high financial commercial value to vaccine manufacturers.

    Btw if you were born in nz mid 70’s onwards the govt has your dna stored under a program to monitor a serious disease starts with G but police need to go through massive hurdles to utilise that.

    And if ANYONE in your wider family has been curious and used popular services like Ancestry DNA then your data/dna is also freely available to anyone with money. A criminal was convicted in UDS after his cousins use of DNA service proved enough data to link a crime scene sample to likely candidates, while not direct implication it narrowed the pool of suspects for police to investigate.
    Every great cause begins as a movement, becomes a business, and eventually degenerates into a racket - Eric Hoffer

  4. #34
    Join Date
    3rd February 2004 - 08:11
    Bike
    2021 Street Triple RS, 2008 KLR650
    Location
    Wallaceville, Upper hutt
    Posts
    5,277
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by R650R View Post
    Good luck with that, it’s 75 demerit points to refuse the new roadside test.

    I also disagree with govt obtaining DNA samples from innocent people .
    The government as had DNA samples of most children born in NZ since 1969 - the newborn Guthrie test. Yes it is ring fenced and and by law not to be used for anything other than health tests but with a serious enough insurrection the govt could change the rule quick enough.
    it's not a bad thing till you throw a KLR into the mix.
    those cheap ass bitches can do anything with ductape.
    (PostalDave on ADVrider)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •