The attachment is from a recent copy of the British Medical Journal. It raises some interesting issues about the "scientific method"...
The attachment is from a recent copy of the British Medical Journal. It raises some interesting issues about the "scientific method"...
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
Not only has parachute use not been scientifically proven, there are also NO laws governing their use.
It seems to me that the government should IMMEDIATELY pass laws to ensure that anyone jumping out of a aeroplane must be wearing an approved parachute. With inspectors in each plane to check, and a licensing (and fine/demerit system) to ensure that people jumping out of aeroplanes are properly tested and qualified
Originally Posted by skidmark
Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
There are laws governing their use.Originally Posted by Ixion
Yes, they must be "approved" to a TSO Standard.
There is a licencing structure for the users of the parachutes.
Your point here is?????
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
I wonder what a placebo parachute would look like?Originally Posted by Hitcher
On the other hand, why would you jump out of a perfectly good aeroplane in the first place!?
Because the door was open.Originally Posted by MacD
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Originally Posted by MacD
i have over 300 jumps under a Mil-Spec canopy.. worst i ever got was a kick in the balls from a loose groin strap..
"Scientific method" is a bit broad really, I'll settle for "randomised controlled clinical trials"...Originally Posted by Hitcher
However the responses are quite fun to read (if you like this sort of thing![]()
Yeah, but did you jump or were you (metaphorically) pushed!?Originally Posted by SARGE
![]()
I think we can arrange a little "quantitive study trial" quite easily. There seems to be an excess of public servants at the moment, so we could chuck them out of the plane at various heights to see if the results quoted are quantifyable in any way......![]()
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
Originally Posted by MacD
im a mad bastard to begin with ... i jumped.. best i ever jumped was a HALO jump..(High Altitude, Low Opening ..)
HAHO's arent as much of a rush, but you get to look around for longer and you can saturate the LZ with frags on the way down too...![]()
also been airlocked out of a sub at 50 metres..(THAT hurt...)
Have jumped at 9000ft strapped to a burly bloke and paid good money for it too..![]()
![]()
Freak of a rush I gotta say! Will definately do it again![]()
What air pressure do subs run at internally? Near atmospheric? I guess flooding the airlock would be pretty hard on the ears/sinuses then!?Originally Posted by SARGE
Originally Posted by MacD
every 10 metres a diver is underwater.. he gets hit with another bar of pressure ( 50 metres = 5 athmospheres pressure.. = about 75psi or so)
a sub stays at 1 bar internally (approx)
from 14.7 psi to 75 psi within a few minutes really feels like youve just had a car drop on you..
after depths like that, your teeth dont fit together right ( dead serious..)
Maybe not in Pomgolia, circa 2003, thoughOriginally Posted by Swoop
Ixion was practicing the art of sarcasm - a worthwhile cause IMO.Originally Posted by Swoop
ACC - It's where the Enron accountants all went.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks