And the correct course of action would be to let my child continue to be molested and the molester go unchecked? I'm not sure that I understand the logic behind that comment Mike, just as I am NOT convinced that active discrimination is a way to "punish" those "guilty" of belonging to a "class" previously described and labelled as the discriminators. I'm 40 and I've only experienced negative discrimination against my "class" and gender. White, male, and middle aged, means you are to blame for everything - excessive health care spending, attitudes to violence in society, inability to commit to relationships thereby causing emotional distress for children, not paying enough tax to maintain an increasingly over-balanced welfare system, and now a defined and labelled threat to all children.Originally Posted by MikeL
I have a disabled child like Grahameeboy and I have acess to no help whatsoever, despite earning less than the national average for household earnings in NZ, because those earning are a single income. I have two other children to support as well. But my disabled child needs grommets, so we have to go privately to get them done, so that we can maximise his potential hearing, which will never be that good as it is a part of his condition. I have to pay for it, which I'll have to borrow money to do, thereby reducing the available cash in my household and affecting everyone else. But I guess I deserve it for being male and subscribing to "white middle-class values".
I'll look forward to the 7am door knock from CYF now then shall I?
Bookmarks