either the SV or VTR, cause plenty of cc and a Fairing.. it needs to have fairing.....both good looking bikes.
either the SV or VTR, cause plenty of cc and a Fairing.. it needs to have fairing.....both good looking bikes.
Matty C
Have you taken your bike over any sweet jumps?
How's about Kawasaki Z750 or Z750S, does it have to be thou?
Having ridden the SV & VTR, I prefered the VTR as it seemed more comfortable for the other half (& was easier to lift the front wheel).....
Plus the current bang 4 buck of the VTR is hard to beat...
i havent ridden the SV but i have ridden the VTR and CBR. a mate of mine has had the same issue that he eventually solved with buying the CBR and he loves it.
in my opinoin the CBR is better simply just on fuel milage as they re pretty much of a muchness.
Best of luck mate.. keep us all informed!![]()
yeah... sorry bro, i thought that ment miles 'n hour.
Think it might depend if youre looking at buying new or second hand? Its a strange line up those three, how about a VFR800, best of both worlds? All three of those bikes listed are more of the budget options from the manufacturers, the SV especially, if you start looking closely is built pretty cheaply. The VFR just has nicer touches everywhere, better suspension and handling, better fuel economy and range, and sounds good too. The Triumph Sprints are worth looking at too, especially if going for a new bike.
Guess if you want a twin, best to buy one soon as they won't be around much longer, the VTR1000 isnt available as an '06 model and doesnt seem there will be a replacement offered.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks