Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: New Rear tyres... some ideas?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    31st March 2003 - 13:09
    Bike
    CBR1000RR
    Location
    Koomeeeooo
    Posts
    5,559
    Blog Entries
    9

    New Rear tyres... some ideas?

    Point #1
    I'm going to be looking for a new rear tyre soon - those in charge have decided a 1.5mm tread depth is the minimum allowable. Who am I to argue with that? Obviously the first part to wear thin is the very middle of the tyre where the tread drops below the 1.5mm while the rest of the tyre remains untouched (yes - I know I should do more track time and even them out - but I don't)

    Point #2
    I recall reading an article a while back talking about how the read tyre tread pattern was (or could be) notably different from the front, because (among other things) it had the advantage of riding in the dry a lot o the time. The theory being the front tyre moves all the water and creates a line of dry road the rear tyre then rides on.

    Long story short it means it's acceptable for the rear tyre to have no tread in the middle, just up the walls (the rear tyre moves out of the dry track when banking).

    Conclusion?
    So here's my question. I I could buy a good rear tyre with no tread cut across the centre of it then in theory it should be acceptable to our good friends at the LTSA for a lot longer because it was ALWAYS below the 1.5mm in the centre?

    Can you guys let me know your thoughts on this, and alos any makes/models of tyre that fit the bill? I'm looking for long lasting compounds not race compounds etc...

    Cheers
    MDU
    $2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details

  2. #2
    Join Date
    13th February 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    Forza 155 SE Pit Bike
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    11,471
    Point #2. Bullshit.

    Who ever came up with that crap needs shooting! Try feeding the power on on your RF on a wet road with a bald rear tire. Wheelspin city my friend.

    Tread also does more than move water. It allows the tyre to "flex" and heat up quickly. I replace my tyres well before they get to the 1.5mm stage. And I allways replace them in pairs.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    31st March 2003 - 13:09
    Bike
    CBR1000RR
    Location
    Koomeeeooo
    Posts
    5,559
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by White trash
    Point #2. Bullshit.

    Who ever came up with that crap needs shooting! Try feeding the power on on your RF on a wet road with a bald rear tire. Wheelspin city my friend.

    Tread also does more than move water. It allows the tyre to "flex" and heat up quickly. I replace my tyres well before they get to the 1.5mm stage. And I allways replace them in pairs.
    I have to admit I was curious about it, but not being a tyre design expert - I took it on board - and it's one of the reasons I raise it here... gimme the lowdown guys...

    The source was Two Wheels Mag, last year sometime
    $2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details

  4. #4
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398
    Quote Originally Posted by White trash
    I replace my tyres well before they get to the 1.5mm stage. And I allways replace them in pairs.
    Wot 'e said.

    Most bike tyres are gonna be well shagged and squared off before the tread gets down that far.

    Dunno if you'll find any slick-in-the-middle road tyres, either, sounds like rubbish to me but then what would I know eh?

    Why don't you want tread on the back, anyway? Like WT said, tread helps them to squiggle around and warm up quicker on the road. That's why you don't run racing wets on the track when it's not actually, you know, *wet*. They melt.

  5. #5
    The actual requirement is 1.5mm over the whole circumference and across 3/4 of the width.This has always bugged me,cars and bikes - but with a bike tyre it can be bald in the middle but still be leagal,kinda crazy,but thems the rules.If you don't want to change your tyre,get a tape measure and measure it out - if you have tread over 1.5 for more than 3/4 of the width you are leagal,make an argument.
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  6. #6
    Join Date
    13th February 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    Forza 155 SE Pit Bike
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    11,471
    Quote Originally Posted by ManDownUnder
    I have to admit I was curious about it, but not being a tyre design expert - I took it on board - and it's one of the reasons I raise it here... gimme the lowdown guys...

    The source was Two Wheels Mag, last year sometime
    I think they're badly mistaken. I use DOT approved race tyres (Pirrelis) and they have a bit of tread across the center 3rd of the tyre and none of the edges. This suits me fine as who rides that fast in the wet anyway?

    Even with my small amount of tread and rellative low torque output, my 600 still lights up like a Christmas tree in 4th when it gets wet.

    As a suggestion, Bridgestone 020 Battlaxes have worked briliantly on RF's I've ridden.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    12th September 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Katana 750, VOR 450 Enduro
    Location
    Wallaceville, Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,521
    Blog Entries
    26
    I know most of the guys on the site rubbish the Dunlop tyres and I've really not got a lot of experience to go on, but when I got my bike I had the following uses in mind (in order of most use).

    1. Daily ride to and from home to work (70kms - Upper Hutt to Wellington)
    2. Quick rides over windy roads in the weekends (ie Rimutakas)
    3. The occasional long ride (to Auckland and back, etc)

    The bike shop recommended Dunlop Sportmax 205 Touring's to me as they had a sporty performance characteristic with the added advantage of being able to withstand the constant daily grind on the motorway without getting shagged in the middle. Not only that but they grip well enough for me in the wet.

    I've done about 6,000 km's on these tyres since labour weekend and they're holding up well. With the daily riding they end up quite smooth in the middle but a quick blast up the takas once a week will see them get quite rough again.

    I'm not claiming to be the fastest or best rider here (not by a long shot!) but I'm finding these tyres to be a good compromise for me and I can keep up with quite a few guys over the 'takas.

    I don't know what they are like as they start to wear further - I will post more about them as this happens but I would imagine I will get at least 10,000 kms out of these tyres on the back.

    I would imagine your RF900 is about the same weight as my FZR750 (205 kg) and probably has a bit more power (I'm about 95hp), so they might be the go for your riding...
    And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.

    - James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    31st March 2003 - 13:09
    Bike
    CBR1000RR
    Location
    Koomeeeooo
    Posts
    5,559
    Blog Entries
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by White trash
    As a suggestion, Bridgestone 020 Battlaxes have worked briliantly on RF's I've ridden.
    Cheers!
    MDU
    $2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details

  9. #9
    Join Date
    13th February 2004 - 06:46
    Bike
    Forza 155 SE Pit Bike
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    11,471
    And if you can't get one for less than $300 letme know, I'll get one couriered over night.

    Dunlop Sportmax are a good bet too and about $15 cheaper.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    27th November 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    None any more
    Location
    Ngaio, Wellington
    Posts
    13,111
    Quote Originally Posted by ManDownUnder
    Point #1
    I'm going to be looking for a new rear tyre soon - those in charge have decided a 1.5mm tread depth is the minimum allowable. Who am I to argue with that? Obviously the first part to wear thin is the very middle of the tyre where the tread drops below the 1.5mm while the rest of the tyre remains untouched (yes - I know I should do more track time and even them out - but I don't)

    Point #2
    I recall reading an article a while back talking about how the read tyre tread pattern was (or could be) notably different from the front, because (among other things) it had the advantage of riding in the dry a lot o the time. The theory being the front tyre moves all the water and creates a line of dry road the rear tyre then rides on.

    Long story short it means it's acceptable for the rear tyre to have no tread in the middle, just up the walls (the rear tyre moves out of the dry track when banking).

    Conclusion?
    So here's my question. I I could buy a good rear tyre with no tread cut across the centre of it then in theory it should be acceptable to our good friends at the LTSA for a lot longer because it was ALWAYS below the 1.5mm in the centre?

    Can you guys let me know your thoughts on this, and alos any makes/models of tyre that fit the bill? I'm looking for long lasting compounds not race compounds etc...

    Cheers
    MDU
    I read this and had to have a colleague administer CPR. I have read some crap theories about tyres before but never so much at once. Tyres are a reasonably "mission critical" part of a successful motorcycling experience. If you want to kill yourself, by all means go tooling round on homemade, hard, bald tyres of differing compounds front and rear...
    "Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]

  11. #11
    Join Date
    12th May 2003 - 11:41
    Bike
    98 HondaRS125
    Location
    Kaukapakapa
    Posts
    412
    Don't be tight
    Luv it!

  12. #12
    Join Date
    5th November 2002 - 11:20
    Bike
    GSXR750 K4
    Location
    South Auckland
    Posts
    2,135
    Motu raises an interesting point but I think you'll find that if you can buy it from a bike store, it'll be legal. The stores aren't going to sell non-legal road tyres or they'd be getting slapped around by guys who just failed their wof.

    in terms of rear tread, my understanding of it is that it typically deals with LESS water than the front and can use a different pattern to make the most of this advanatge in terms of heat disspertion and wear. the Diablos are a great example of this with the front heavily grooved down the centre and the rear having a small strip of no tread with more grooves off centre.
    I'm using them everyday and i've been trying to break the rear loose a few times to test the grip in the rain. My impressions have been that the Diablo corsas crap ALL over the D207's I had fitted as standard not just in the dry but also the wet (and the 207's have stack loads more tread down the centre of the rear). Yes I know they are a higher grade of rubber but I really have to work the throttle to get it spinning now compared to actively trying to stop the back letting go before.

    hope that helps a little
    (P.s. I'm a totally biased Pirelli fan.. they kick butt... I recommend diablos if only because I've hardly ever heard road users complain about them)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    31st March 2003 - 13:09
    Bike
    CBR1000RR
    Location
    Koomeeeooo
    Posts
    5,559
    Blog Entries
    9
    cheers guys - all good info!

    I'm amased at the rate the RF gets through tires though - my last bike was a 550 and they lasted a site longer... aaaa the price of horsepower (not to mention the FUN of horsepower)

    I'll have a ring around and see what kind of prices I can get on the rubber too....
    $2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details

  14. #14
    Join Date
    31st March 2003 - 13:09
    Bike
    CBR1000RR
    Location
    Koomeeeooo
    Posts
    5,559
    Blog Entries
    9
    Guys...

    Check out the pricing I found online at http://www.starcycle.com/street.html...!

    Given that the current US exchange rate is $0.68 or so, multiply by about 1.5 and you've got the price...

    A sample of what'son that page (under Pirelli for example). No I haven't done a LOT of searching for prices, but this isn't bad huh?

    To be fair freight needs to be added... but surface shipping wouldn't cost that much and I'm getting that info from them as soon as they reply to my email - I'll let you how how it comes out.

    PIRELLI DIABLO CORSA PART#
    SIZE
    OUR
    PRICE

    1449400 120/70-17 FRONT $126.95

    1449500 180/55-17 REAR $137.95
    1449600 190/50-17 REAR $176.95
    PIRELLI DIABLO PART#
    SIZE
    OUR
    PRICE

    1429600 130/70-16 FRONT $109.95
    1430600 110/70-17 FRONT $109.95
    1430200 120/60-17 FRONT $109.95
    1430700 120/70-17 FRONT $109.95

    1430300 150/60-17 REAR $115.95
    1430400 160/60-17 REAR $117.95
    1430000 180/55-17 REAR $126.95
    1429700 190/50-17 REAR $129.95
    1429900 200/50-17 REAR $163.95
    $2,000 cash if you find a buyer for my house, kumeuhouseforsale@straightshooters.co.nz for details

  15. #15
    Join Date
    12th September 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Katana 750, VOR 450 Enduro
    Location
    Wallaceville, Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,521
    Blog Entries
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by ManDownUnder
    Guys...

    Check out the pricing I found online at http://www.starcycle.com/street.html...!
    No 160/60-18 rears then
    And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.

    - James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •