Do you think they are trained to say that, or are they really trying to help you...
Do you think they are trained to say that, or are they really trying to help you...
dunno... she sounded sincere (and prolly pissed off wth work)Originally Posted by bear
The thing that really annoys me with vehicle insurance is that you pay to insure a vehicle for a set value, but after the crash, they will only pay out on percieved market value, so you are paying for a service you wont get.
If I insure my bike for $5k I want $5k if it gets totalled, not $3k because one in the shop was selling for that. Personally I view that as theft.
Someone at AMI once told me that the reason why they dont like european bikes is that the parts cost more to ship over than for jap bikes - hence the premium is higher. Not sure if its true or not.
The contents of this post are my opinion and may not be subjected to any form of reality
It means I'm not an authority or a teacher, and may not have any experience so take things with a pinch of salt (a.k.a bullshit) rather than fact
I've said this before in other threads, but it's worth suggesting again.
What's needed is an insurance equivalent of Credit Union. Ie, an insurance trust that is owned solely by those people who have policies with it. Profit becomes a secondary consideration, when the trust has a good year (lack of claims) they can return some of the profit to their customers/shareholders in cheaper premiums the next year, putting the rest aside for those inevitable poor years.
There has to be a market for this, so why isn't anyone doing it?
Hayden - Evidence that even the mediocre can achieve great things.
((U+C+I) x (10-S))/20 x A x 1/(1-sin(F/10))
Originally Posted by TwoSeven
What about if you insure it for 3k and they pay you 5k? The principal of indemnity works both ways.
I've seen insurers pay higher.
If you "personally view it as theft", don't buy it - who is making you?
That's how insurance started - Mutual Insurers.Originally Posted by Ghost Lemur
NZ used to have several Motor Mutuals - SIMU/NIMU, T&G and now AA Insurance.
There isn't a market for this because Motor Insurance is a "loss leader", a class of business used to get other (more profitable) lines on board, like house and contents. Most insurers wouldn't do it if they didn't have to.
My flatmate has had a DIC, at least one demerit point 3 month suspension and had several accidents (strangely only one, a single vehicle accident, was actually his fault...actually no, scrub that, he had a minor fender bender a couple of weeks ago). National Auto Club are the only people who will insure him, and they screw him for premiums. He pays around $2000/year for comprehensive. I pay about $450/year for comprehensive commercial.Originally Posted by celticno6
FYI
I’ve just done a bit of shopping around for insurance quotes (full cover) for a 2004 CB900 Hornet (919cc) valued at $10,995.
SWAN
Annually: $850
Excess: ?
AMI Insurance
Annually: $820.95
Excess: $300
Protecta Insurance
Annually: $1166
Excess: 15% if damaged, 20% if stolen
Classic Cover (have to be 30yrs old or over)
Annually: $591.57
Excess: $550
Cheers
try john baker,
Classic cover will not offer insurance if you have not had a full motorcycle licence for longer than 2 years. No matter your age.
The art of being wise is knowing what to overlook.
Originally Posted by Groins_NZ
Have you tired a qoute from Honda riders club ?, they use a broker in the SI(main land), David Golightly , very good deals, also insure non Hondas, but still get the bulk buy corparate deal price. pm me if you want the contact details.
F/F
"Kiwi Biker, still a great place despite the mods "
"Would crawl over broken glass before owning Suzuki"
The only reason I only ride in the Iron man Class is I have no friends left to enter the two man events,
my own fault really.
No they aren't.Originally Posted by NSR-Dan
IAG own website lists State as a "brand".
Best you do a bit of research before you comment further:We have three distinct trading channels – State, NZI and Corporate Partnerships.
http://www.iag.co.nz/IAGNZBrands/
they can decline the claim if it said in the policy that the bike must be road worthy and registered. if it wasnt at the time of the claim then your friend was breaching the contract and they can decline cover altogether.Originally Posted by Oscar
most companys have an exclusion that no cover offered if the vehicle insured is not road worthy (no WOF) or not registered. regardless if it was a contributing factor to the claim or not.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks