You are right....followed a mate on a Firestorm and it was only when I opened my SV out that the difference was made........Originally Posted by manuboy
You are right....followed a mate on a Firestorm and it was only when I opened my SV out that the difference was made........Originally Posted by manuboy
I've ridden both, riding a VTR right now as the gixxer is in for a service, and the SV wins hands down. Better engine, better handling, better looking.
And it's not a Honda and therefore not gay. Like boomer and all other honda riders.
I can personally vouch that Boomer is not gay.......sorry too much detail again!!Originally Posted by The_Dover
On the road there would be bugger all in it. Comparing my old vtr to the tlr i own now, the tlr would leave the vtr for dead over 200 clicks.
VTR is a very underrated bike, and would be my choice between the two.
Just cos he turned you down dont mean he wont turn around.Originally Posted by Grahameeboy
![]()
who's vouching for who??
:slap:
No cos its very wrong.................Originally Posted by Grahameeboy
The TL has 120hp
The curent SV has 108
The VTR has always had 110hp
BTW hp & ps are the same
but........ comming from you this info means shit.... nothing but compleat and utter shitOriginally Posted by The_Dover
And yes both bike sat in my garage for quite some time so I spent a lot of time on both, to differant bikes The SV does have more top end but thats bout it
(SV more suited for the track)
cheers DD
(Definately Dodgy)
Suzuki still seem to be claiming 86.8kw, or just over 116hp for the SV1000S.Originally Posted by dangerous
hp and ps are similar but not quite the same [ps *0.9831 = hp]... I know, i know...![]()
...and I don't wanna die, just want to ride my motorcy...cle (Arlo Guthrie)
As long as we're still debating
The VTR has a better build quality and some nice little touches. The position is def more upright. The sv is injected, the VTR is still not (as far as i know). Both bikes sound good with a decent set of pipes. The SV will have a slightly larger fuel range (i get 230-245 before i wuss out and gas up at legalish speeds).
But i forgot. The VTR was never on the menu till it was mentioned that they sucked right![]()
yeah sorry I believe that the 05- was up'd in the hp a tad..... of course the SV is capable of more than the VTR due to its inj, but for some reason Suzuki want to keep it de tuned unlike the TL.Originally Posted by bane
Isent it past your bed timeOriginally Posted by manuboy
hey but ya right inj means way beter economy..... but ya have to love the way the VTR carbs dump a shit load a fuel at once and that rush a power comes on (bit slugish till then
cheers DD
(Definately Dodgy)
i work with a guy who rides a sv only mods being a set of cans and pc2,he rode my TL mods being cans,tre,remap with a yosh box,to his dismay he really noticed the difference saying the tl felt alot stronger.as far as the vtr goes great bike but if you read anything other than honda advertisments then general consensus is the tl/sv motor is definately stronger,hard to really compare the tlr with a vtr,in every suituation i can think of the tlr would waste a vtr power wise and lets not forget a vtr isnt exactly overendowed with high performance suspension,all comes back to the same old story its all about rider ability.
I still believe the VTR is the better road bike, has more grunt under 6... forgiving and easier to ride hard..Originally Posted by 98tls
better all rounder i guess,but not as much fun i reckon,plus in my opinion vtrs are almost as ugly as the sv.
have to agree, the vtr does nothing for me in the looks department.
not so, at least as far as I'm aware.Originally Posted by slob
but streetfightering a TLS could be cool too
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks