Bugger,they are dead in the water.Ah well,who cares - closest I'd get to one is coining the tank of some rich pricks pride and joy.
http://www.businessweek.com/autos/co...aign_id=search
Bugger,they are dead in the water.Ah well,who cares - closest I'd get to one is coining the tank of some rich pricks pride and joy.
http://www.businessweek.com/autos/co...aign_id=search
poohs i hate it when little guys get squashed. yet another step towards the global domination of just a few manufacturers....
Yeah abit sad really, I liked that new commando.
bugger thats got to suck,
Dont sweat the small stuff, It only makes you stressed,
Damn not that I could afford one anyway.
I love the smell of twin V16's in the morning..
now before we feel too sorry for them. Just remember who was responsible for the motorcycle with a rotary engine....
There is no dark side of the moon, really, as a matter of fact. Its all dark...
BSA were responsable for the Norton rotary,that's where it started.
Some Wankel.Originally Posted by froggyfrenchman
Perhaps Norton translates to 'Destined to Bankrupt' in Hindi or something.
I feel sorry for existing owners who need the parts back up!!
"Resort to the law so exhausts finances, patience, courage, hope, so overthrows the brain and breaks the heart, that there is not one honourable lawyer who would not give the warning "Suffer any wrong rather than come here".
Charles Dickens
My apologies. Norton bought the tooling from Sachs.Originally Posted by Motu
oh and this link may be usefull-
http://www.nortonmotors.co.uk/
A guy called Mercer, lived in Bradford, northern England, had a BSA Bantam powered by a home built rotary in the 1950s. Many years before the wankel engine. As far as I can remember the bike is in the Dewsbury museumOriginally Posted by froggyfrenchman
I have an old magazine around somewhere with that rotary powered BSA in it,and the story about it.Back in the days of the big upheaval when BSATriumphVilliersNortonMatchlessAJSandahostofothe rs were going under and throwing everything overboard to stay afloat...some guy had been set the task to make a rotary motor...and in the panic they forgot about him.I guess some beancounter said one day - ''Why do we supply a box of 2 ply toilet rolls to shed 47 every week? Go down there and see what they are doing'' And they found he'd been working quietly away for years undisturbed and had that prototype running.He was too far along to stop,I think having sorted the charge cooling,and they continued the development.Norton was just a name to hang on it because BSA and Matchless were out of favour,and Triumph were the bad boys at Meridan doing the communist thing.Originally Posted by Bonez
I stand duly corected
There is no dark side of the moon, really, as a matter of fact. Its all dark...
Shouldnt that read "norton goes under-again?"
What a shame, its good to have more manufacturers in the mix.
thats a shame.
I thought long and hard about going on their waitlist for $500USD up front. You got a sweatshirt and a hat also. Glad I didnt now, cos that would have been an expensive hat.
This months Cycle World has a four page feature on one of the production intent 962's, along with the Triumph Scrambler and the Ducati SportClassic.
As for the comment about parts, there are heaps of repro and NOS stuff for "old " Nortons, Kenny Dreer's bike was all new.
Hopefully someone will pick it* up and run with it.
*it being the proprietary design, the name and all the tooling.
I thought elections were decided by angry posts on social media. - F5 Dave
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks