I don't think so in the age of the modern communications.
How many commute to (and from) work every weekday at the same time to sit at a computer and communicate with fellow commuters (be they co-workers or outsiders)? Plenty, I imagine.
Why not communicate with them using their computer at home linked through a broadband connection?
Because they need to have face-to-face meetings with their co-workers or visitors I hear them say? So, arrange to meet with them out of commute hours and travel accordingy, so spreading the load on the transportation system more efficiently.
Or, because they need the social interaction with co-workers? Firstly, they need to be careful not to tell the boss they spend company time BSing with co-workers - but suely they can also arrange to meet them for coffee or lunch, etc., again avoiding travel during the busy times.
Or, they can't work at home - too many distractions? OK, go to a local (around the corner) satellite/serviced office (sort of an internet cafe for business people).
Or, how the boss know they are working if they are not in the office where he can see them? If the criterion for getting paid is to be present in the office - why are they employed in the first place?
Surely there are better solutions to the commute/congestion problem than spending billions of dollars (in roads, public transport systems, fuel, pollution, etc) in order to move people around when the information that people exchange that underpins the economy can be moved around for virtually nothing!
Wouldn't the ultimate benefit be greater freedom of choice and movement than we have today - and therefore a higher standard of living?
Bookmarks