Page 10 of 14 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 136 to 150 of 208

Thread: radar detectors

  1. #136
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Racey Rider
    Can you tell me the relevant law that says no?
    no to what?

  2. #137
    Join Date
    13th March 2003 - 11:47
    Bike
    2006 Honda XR250L
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    7,355
    Quote Originally Posted by marty
    no to what?

    I think he's talking about covered lights. From what I am aware there is no law against covering your headlights during the hours of daylight, so long as you aren't covering indicator, tail or reverse lights at all.
    Cheers

    Merv

  3. #138
    Join Date
    30th May 2003 - 21:22
    Bike
    Walking
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    1,719
    Quote Originally Posted by marty
    no to what?
    You implied that we can,t cover our headlights during the day.

    What's the law that says we can't do that? Or have I misunderstood you?

    As long as the light is there, and the cover is easy to remove for use of the light. It would sometimes be of benefit to have them covered. Plus a good fitting light cover that matches in with the bike can look coo,,,,,,,,
    appealing to the eye.

    Yes I know it's safer to have the light on!!

  4. #139
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Racey Rider
    You implied that we can,t cover our headlights during the day.

    What's the law that says we can't do that? Or have I misunderstood you?

    i didn't imply anything. i was simply taking the piss.

  5. #140
    Join Date
    21st December 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    Manx TT by Sega
    Location
    Welly
    Posts
    2,718
    Just a question - if you take a hand held laser - and point it at a car - and then rapidly move the unit forward as you are doing it - will it show a higher reading on the car?

  6. #141
    Join Date
    30th May 2003 - 21:22
    Bike
    Walking
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    1,719
    Quote Originally Posted by marty
    i didn't imply anything. i was simply taking the piss.
    Oh!

    You need to work on that!
    When "taking the piss", the "pisser" really should word it well enough that thee "pissee" has no option but to realize the've been "pissed" on!





    Now THATS "taking the piss"

  7. #142
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    oh is THAT how it works.

  8. #143
    Join Date
    13th March 2003 - 11:47
    Bike
    2006 Honda XR250L
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    7,355
    Depends who's watching eh!
    Cheers

    Merv

  9. #144
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by wkid_one
    Just a question - if you take a hand held laser - and point it at a car - and then rapidly move the unit forward as you are doing it - will it show a higher reading on the car?
    I doubt it, the pulse rate is too short. Handheld radar was good at that though.

  10. #145
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
    I doubt it, the pulse rate is too short. Handheld radar was good at that though.
    actually, you can get an error, by washing the laser up and over the bonnet. it is not hard to do.

    also, if you aim the laser onto the road about 30 feet in front of you, and wash it away, you can get it to show an accellerating speed, hence the ability to have stationary objects (eg the side of a building) doing 50km/h. if you have a digital camera attached to the back of the laser, taking photos of this, then you can see how uneducated people believe that they are inaccurate.

    if used correctly, and the principles of use applied, then they are extremely accurate.

  11. #146
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    [QUOTE=marty]actually, you can get an error, by washing the laser up and over the bonnet. it is not hard to do.
    QUOTE]

    An error reading or an inaccurate speed?

  12. #147
    Join Date
    10th December 2003 - 13:00
    Bike
    Shanksters Pony
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    2,647
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
    An error reading or an inaccurate speed?
    Read the rest of Marty's post.

    Quote Originally Posted by marty
    if used correctly, and the principles of use applied, then they are extremely accurate.
    You should know better, I guess you are just being a shit stirrer huh.

  13. #148
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by marty
    actually, you can get an error, by washing the laser up and over the bonnet. it is not hard to do.
    also, if you aim the laser onto the road about 30 feet in front of you, and wash it away, you can get it to show an accellerating speed, hence the ability to have stationary objects (eg the side of a building) doing 50km/h. if you have a digital camera attached to the back of the laser, taking photos of this, then you can see how uneducated people believe that they are inaccurate.
    if used correctly, and the principles of use applied, then they are extremely accurate.
    Yeah, read it. Now tell me if the car, a moving object, gives an error reading or inaccurate speed like the stationary object.

  14. #149
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    i guess it depends what side of the fence you're on. a building will give an inaccurate speed, if it's speed is supposed to be zero, but if it's on the back of a truck it could be 70km/h........

  15. #150
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    It starting to sound like you guys don't use Stalker Laser much.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •