Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 22 of 22

Thread: Super Bowl champion quarterback knocked off his 'busa

  1. #16
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop
    Like Mark Inglis who climbed Mt Everest recently, knew the risks, got frostbite and came back to NZ to have priority surgery at the taxpayers expense.
    No insurance cover???
    Yes exactly... no ACC for him. He's a fricken retard that out of anyone in the world should know better. Dumb fucks like him should carry the can for themselves. (I'm assuming that in fact ACC did pay for his latest amputations?)

  2. #17
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    Quote Originally Posted by Toast
    Being a dip and not wearing a helmet doesn't seem to benefit anyone though...
    Apart from those who believe adults should make their own decisions, not made for them by sheltered academics living in Governmental cocoons in Wellington.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    25th October 2002 - 17:30
    Bike
    GSXR1000
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,291
    How about this then. Now most of the people here talking 'individual-choice' are experienced riders, some with many miles and years under their belts. Shit some of these guys might not have had an 'off' for many years as well. So from their perspective, I can see why they feel that way.

    But stop to think of other riders for a minute, especially those who are maybe considering their first bike. Now as we all know, image is a part of motorcycling. Whether you want one or not, you've got one. So young newbie wanting to look as cool as possible, takes advantage of the no hemlet law and rides the streets for the first time. Ever. I'm not saying he's destined to come off, but his chances are higher than most. I not arguing that this is the sole reason we should have helmet laws, but I feel it is an important one.

    New riders and those with little experience are the ones we need to be thinking of here, not only ourselves.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    2nd February 2005 - 13:41
    Bike
    600RR3
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
    Apart from those who believe adults should make their own decisions, not made for them by sheltered academics living in Governmental cocoons in Wellington.
    But the issue here is not merely about him being able to make decisions that affect only him, it's about the fact that his decision not to wear a helmet costs the rest of us financially, in ACC...and is that fair?

    The difference in arguments here is similar to the different sides during debate about the no smoking in public bars law...smokers claimed that it was merely the government infringing on their personal freedoms...which is bullshit. They can kill themselves with ciggies, but their decision to smoke costs me, in terms of my health, so it's not merely about them being able to make decisions for themselves.

    Back to the helmet case...

    In a country like the US though, where there's no ACC act or equivalent (to my knowledge), give the freedom to be a dickhead, since that soft little head is unlikely to cause me more harm than a helmeted one.
    ...

  5. #20
    Join Date
    8th January 2005 - 15:05
    Bike
    Triumph Speed Triple
    Location
    New Plymouth
    Posts
    10,271
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Toast
    it's about the fact that his decision not to wear a helmet costs the rest of us financially, in ACC...and is that fair?
    Compared to what we used to have, it most certainly is. We used to have to sue somebody, to do that successfully you needed to prove blame. If the Police were to busy to attend the accident you were shit out of luck right there. (That happened to my brother.)

    If you had an accident at work you had to sue your employer to get compensation. Since we tend to get exactly the justice we can afford this didn't always end well.

    ACC was supposed to be a no fault, no liability, system. If a guy broke his leg jumping over a prison wall he got ACC. That's OK, that's a small price to pay.

    Over the years ACC has been watered down and the "social contract" the populace entrered into when they gave up the right to sue has been corrupted. As corrupted as it has become though, ACC is still just possibly more fair than what existed previously.

    I would suspect, however, that all prudent travellers would have insurance. Unless we *know* that Ingles didn't have insurance we can't even comment.
    There is a grey blur, and a green blur. I try to stay on the grey one. - Joey Dunlop

  6. #21
    Join Date
    2nd April 2005 - 11:58
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    5,095
    Seven hours in surgery.... 1/2 hour to fix the injuries, 6 1/2 hours plastic surgery to save the face sponsors want!
    They shall not grow old as we that are left grow old.
    Age shall not weary them nor the years condemn.
    At the going down of the sun and in the evening,
    we will remember them

  7. #22
    Join Date
    20th August 2003 - 10:00
    Bike
    'o6 Spewzooki Banned it.
    Location
    Costa del Nord
    Posts
    6,553
    So the pro-helmet law brigade would be happy to see bikes banned?
    They also are a great cost to the tax-payer.
    Be careful what you wish for.
    Speed doesn't kill people.
    Stupidity kills people.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •