Supra vs ZX10 vs 636 - interesting

[mynameis]

Haha you're dead f**ken right, that's what I was gona say a 636 will pace the 1000 anyday with a good rider. Plus Supra was lucky it was just straight drags otherwise the bikes would have pissed all over the cage mate !

That guy on the 636 must be a pussy. Theres no way a zx10 is that much faster on acceleration than a Zx636. The 636 should have toasted the supra 700hp or not. Theres only about 1sec difference between a ZX10 and a ZX636 over a standing 1/4.

[N4CR]

I agree - on a ride I saw Buggy completely smash a near new M3 who really wanted to be king of the road This was on a straight bit of motorway too so there was no slowing down for corners involved.

With a 0-100 time of 5.2 secs a 250 could beat one off the lights... they are limited to 155mph anyway, buggy won't get there but close enough.

The third-generation M3 provides still further proof of BMW M 's technological expertise. The newly developed 3.2-litre engine delivers:

* 343 bhp at 7,900 rpm - a specific output of 105 bhp per litre
* 365Nm of torque at 4,900 rpm
* 0-62 sprint in just 5.2 seconds

and
Top speed: 155Mph (Electronically limited)

Not really a fast car at all compared to your pretty rare non-ricing supras with 10 gazillion HP. Still I'd like to see dyno sheets for all the '800hp supras' out there. Apparently everyones cousins vetinarians brother in laws butcher knows someone with a '500hp rotang' or a holden or general rice that could kick 'insert name here's' ass.

Not suprising that a 600 dicked it at all with figures like that.

[justsomeguy]

With a 0-100 time of 5.2 secs a 250 could beat one off the lights... they are limited to 155mph anyway, buggy won't get there but close enough.

Hmm, dunno bout that......

A 250 (the one's we ride) is a 14 sec bike, a M3 is a 13 sec car.

[N4CR]

Hmm, dunno bout that......

A 250 (the one's we ride) is a 14 sec bike, a M3 is a 13 sec car.

Keyword off the lights just the usual 0-speedlimit crap you do on a 250. I don't drag cars to 150+kmh over 400m. Slightly silly in most situations.
RS250's get 12.2-12.6 depending on the rider but that's cheating

[Brett]

Agreed, quarter mile times the 636 and the thou would be pretty comparable, but when rolling on form a decent speed, the extra power makes the difference. It is that little bit of extra torque which manages to propel it past the 636...same principle why a car pullin an 11 sec quarter requires so much more HP to pull a 10 sec flat.

[number33]

Sitting on the grass bank under a pine tree at the Wanganui cemetry circuit watching the difference accelerate between 600 and 1000cc there's SFA difference. Ya can't even tell which is which.

[MD]

The 636 owners assn has issued a recall on that poofta's bike since he obviously isn't deserving enough and capable enough to own one.
I've come out of a bend many a time behind a 1000 when we're all riding full on and the 6 can stay pretty close on their tail until about 240+. Even after that it's not a big gap like that twat in the vid.
And he is an idiot drag racing at night in jeans and sneakers. His beach wear must have been in the wash.