I thought about this long and hard Dino and I dont think I can give up all that offroad traction that the Kenda's offer at the moment, turns the Big into, well dare I say, a Big dirt bike
Am picking the old girl up tomorrow and will do some reliability runs for confidence sake then we can get together for an old friends reunion (I'll bring hankies for you)![]()
It is almost new tire time (got almost 6k out of that Kenda big block).
I was thinking of giving the popular T63 a try, but this means going from the usual 140/80-18 to a 130/80-18.
What should I expect to feel different running the smaller tire?
Also, what sort of km's have people got out of them?
I ran a T63 rear for about 2000ks. It was probaly half worn when I took it off. Great tire I thought. Didn't notice any problems with the narrower width; actually i think it helps it in wet contitions cos it digs down to the hard stuff better. Roosts gravel pretty good as recall![]()
....wherezz that track go
....wherezz that track go
I like skinny tyres. Turn quicker and digs through gravel for more traction. Less squirming on top like fat tyres. I'm running a 110 on the back at the moment. Bloody awesome. Looks silly though, and won't last long.
Lucky I pick them up real cheap
Fat tyres for show, skinny tyres for go....on gravel anyway.
Thanks for the info guys, seems the 130 should be a pretty good option.
I'm looking for a new rear tyre for my Suzuki Dr 350. I'm riding about 70% street and 30% gravel roads, I was at biketreads today and they recommended me the Pirelli MT 90, in the Internet I found a lot of bad things about this tyre. Has anyone this tyre?
Wich can you recommend? The should last very long (I'm riding about 15000 km a year), the tyre size should be between 120 and 140 /80/ 18
Thanks for help
Interesting discussion on the merits of skinnier tyres, I spent 15 years belonging to varios 4wd clubs around the country and was also involved in competitions, there were a lot of off road scenarios where the narrow/aggressive tyres worked better in the mud for exactly the same reason that was mentioned, they dug through the soft crap on top and found traction underneath where the fatter tyres tended to float on top more, if the soft, top layer was deeper then the fatter tyres had an advantge because they kept the diffs out of the mud better so it can vary on the situation.
I also worked with John Deere tractors for few years an got into things like ballasting for maximum traction efficiency. Most modern tractors now have wheel slip indicators, which compares the speed over the ground using a ground speed radar against what the tractor should be doing in any respective gear . If the ground speed dropped below what it should be doing then obviously the wheels were starting to slip. Tractors fitted with 2 skinny duals at the back (and sometimes in the front) generally achieved less sliipage than ones fitted with big fat singles for the same reasons, they tended to get the lugs further into the ground and in some situations, its been proven that the same setup could out perform tractors fitted with rubber tracks.
Like the old saying goes, horsepower is only as effective as to how well you can convert it to traction.
COP, "Ive been waiting to catch you all day"
BIKER "Sorry officer, I got here as fast as I could"
Mine came with a D605 on the front which is about half worn and Ive had no probs with it at all so far on tar or shingle. (22 psi)
COP, "Ive been waiting to catch you all day"
BIKER "Sorry officer, I got here as fast as I could"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks