
Originally Posted by
Kokopelli
Yes, it's the same tyre size. The tyre had 5000km on it, but looked like it could easily double this amount. The wear was also distributed quite evenly, with no obvious flat spot.
I had and still have an Anakee on the front. The last one lasted up to 16000km, but had a pronounced saw-tooth pattern by then. This bike is my main form of transport, so I needed a new tyre immediately.
I am usually not picky when it comes to tyres. I used to run Tourance, but they've become too expensive. I found the Anakee to be good tyres, but it's always possible that there are better ones available.
I liked the Shinko 705 because the tread pattern worked really well on gravel and they seemed to stick well enough on the road, wet or dry.
Even though my tyres were mismatched with a radial on the front and a cross-ply on the rear I got confident enough to run it to the edge. Having said that, getting to the edge of the Shinko seems to be harder than reaching the edge of an Anakee.
Chances are this was just a fluke. I know I could pick up a nail anytime and deflate the tyre with a similar result. But seeing the tyre in this state has certainly spooked me.
When I just got the tyre I queried the tyre pressure with Shinko. Their response wasn't really satisfactory. I know that 33psi is the maximum allowable tyre pressure, but is this the ideal pressure for a 250kg bike?
The TKC80 is also a cross-ply and from memory (I may be wrong here) it has a mximum pressure of 42psi. BMW recommends 36 psi for the rear tyre.
Maybe the tyre was fine, but is just not suitable for my heavy bike, or it was just a manufacturing fluke. As you have said, this can happen. Mind you, I know stuff-all about how they do quality control on tyres.
Maybe it's: round, check, black, check Ok, good to go?
I certainly hope it was just a fluke. Because I thought these tyres had a good potential.
Bookmarks