I've had a mix of 2 and 4 stroke bikes over the years and they each have their good and bad points. I like the power-band that 2-strokes have but I also like the engine braking of a 4-stroke. The smell of a two-stroke I do not mind and I also love the simplicity of maintenance ("Overhead what? Nah, mate, you just undo four bolts and pull the head off.") but I'm not keen on the propensity of the engine to seize midway through a turn (only happened the once and it took a few miles to get my arse to unclench, didn't know what it was at the time but I didn't like it much.)
I've enjoyed riding 2-strokes and I've enjoyed riding 4-strokes - that's all that matters, really.
Would I get another 2-stroke? Possibly. If I found a bike I liked that was a 2-stroke I certainly would not reject it because it was a two-stroke.
As to the style and make prejudices, I just don't get it.
I prefer Enduros and classic tourers - but I'll admire the look of nearly any bike. I've had bad experiences with the two Kawasakis I've ridden and I'd be leery buying one for myself but I would not dis the make and I'm sure that there are plenty of people who have had nothing but reliable service from their Kawasakis. Hondas, Suzukis, Yamahas, Puch and Zundapp - owned them and been quite satisfied.
There are many types of bike that I would not buy because they do not suit the style of riding I like but that does not negate their suitability for other riders.
A decent bike is one that does what you personally want it to do - if you want to commute daily on the smell of an oily rag, then an old FA50 would be a "decent" bike so long as it was still running reliably.
Bookmarks