I'm kinda with Paulus and **R1** on this one, go for the R1. But why don't you just go for a ride on the bugger...what are doing asking us if you haven't even gone for a squirt? Oh, I get it....maybe you are more worried about what other people think of your "has to be new" toy than how it actually rides. In that case stick with your higher km but "newer and therefore must be better" ride.Originally Posted by Paulus
Assuming you are seriously considering it, here's a few points that sprang into what's left of my mind:
1/ Both machines weigh virtually the same
2/ Both machines employ the same front brake calipers but R1 discs are larger so it should brake better
3/ R1 has upside down forks, R6 conventional
4/ R1 has done way less km's (suspension etc in better shape)
5/ R6 looks more "modern"
6/ R1 needs a steering damper (if not fitted)
7/ Up to you whether you prefer slightly snatchy fuel injection or smoother less efficient carbs
8/ Torquey R1 will not have been revved as hard as a peaky 600 (if you're not revving it you won't be ready for an R1)
9/ R1 has way more torque and +30hp
To my mind the 98-99 R1 is a modern classic that changed the way we look at superbikes. It is older but undeniably quicker than your 600. It really comes down to whether you have the potential funds to buy something newer in the near future. If not, then the R1 is a good way of getting a huge performance increase without laying out any more dosh.
Here's a link to the Performance Bikes article mentioned above:
http://www.r1-forum.com/forums/showt...highlight=turn
Bookmarks