FWIW, I'll chuck in a 'me too' with regards to Spud's opinion on the legal niceties. Clear-cut case of justifiable self-defense, so assault charges won't stick, but woe betide the gunshop owner if he broke any rules about storing weapons and ammunition.
Bear in mind that keeping magazines loaded is a no-no. As far as I recall, SAI don't keep revolvers under the glass counter, just automatic pistols (I should know, with the time I've spent drooling over that counter) so we're talking about slapping in a pre-loaded mag here, not feeding loose rounds into a revolver. Woopsy. (Correct me if I'm wrong, anyone?)
I called a friend who's a bit of a gun nut and has known the SAI guys in question for quite some time as soon as I heard the story. His comment was that he's not surprised, as they've been saying for years how they'll do exactly that, should such a situation ever arise. Might make it difficult to play the "we are but 'umble storekeepers, yer 'onour" card.
As I've stated before, I think that NZ's firearms laws are about the best in the world vis-a-vis keeping a good balance between making shooting an accessible sport and limiting access to weapons to those who will use them responsibly. I'll be watching the outcome of this case with interest.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Bookmarks