Disclaimer: I'm pretty new to bikes, so no doubt people will scream at my naiivity.
I had wondered about this, and then something occurred to me. When you choose a bike over a car, you've already thrown away the big boot and passenger space that might make you hesitate to choose a sportscar over a sedan (or wagon ...). There's (comparitively speaking) stuff all difference between any maker's road bikes (whether sportsbike or tourer) and their race bikes, when compared to a car, where an Accord is very different from an NSX, let alone an F1 car. About all they need to do to make a road bike is find somewhere for some lights, an alternator and a numberplate.
So a bike manufacturer (or bike division of a larger manufacturer) can afford to be almost as focussed as Ferrari is anyway.
Sound reasonable?
Richard
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
When it comes to bikes give me a jappa anyday of the week.
Even a honda.
did I type that out loud?
I raced one two weeks ago...
Amost 1second faster....![]()
Crazy Steve..
I dont think sooooooooo.....
Me beaty the Kawasaki Zx1400.....![]()
Now me have fastest production MotorCycle in The WORLD.....
Ha Ha.....
Also....that same day a Harley raced that Zx1400 and beat it to....![]()
Crazy Steve...
Finn, tell your brother he's a munter for buying a Ferrari in Cabriolet form. Secondly, tell him to man up and get a proper manual, the F1s just look silly, they don't have that Ferrari trademark exposed gear linkage gate.
Oh, and more on topic, MV Agusta have a far better racing pedigree than Ducati, especially pre 70s when they had a record 37 world championships in various classes (From a 70s "On Two Wheels" magazine). Ducati didn't really start winning races in any great numbers until 1975.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks