I know this thread is going to spark some emotions with certain people on KB... And I was wondering if it would be worth even bringing this up, and I mean no dis-respect to anyone, and I apologise in advance if anyone is offended by this...
I've just come back from my smoke break with my co-workers, and one of them was talking about a Documentary that was on Sky (the History Channel I believe) last night... called "Loose Change"
Which is based on the events of 9/11.
9/11 was most definaltey a day that the whole world will never forget, it affected so many people worldwide...
However, there is a HUGE amount of "blurred' evidence, relating to this attack.
I personally am on the fence. Do I believe it was a terrorist attack or something else? I'm not fully convinced either way.
There have been numerous documentarys regarding this...
The most intriging (sp) one so far would be "Loose Change" which has two editions...
You can veiw the whole documentary here:
http://www.loosechange911.com/
That site includes the full movie thingy, evidence and facts and so forth...
They started off with Loose Change... they recieved feedback from the public, the victims and the victims families... from security agents and so forth, which resulted in better details, and some of the original film being incorrect... they revised this and made Loose Change 2nd Edition... again as before they have recieved further feedback, done more research and gained more professional help in certain areas... and are now in the process of making Loose Change 3rd Edition.
I guess I'm one of the many who are still searching for answers, there are too many details that are blurred, too many biased opinions, too many things that make no sense at all.
The government claims no Black Boxes were found from all 4 of the planes involved in 9/11. Although firefighters and security agents working at ground zero gave first hand accounts of escourting special agents around the sites searching for the boxes, they claim 3 out of the 4 boxes were infact found. They also claim that the passport of one of the terrorists was found after it "must have flown out of his pocket upon collision". Does it not seem strange to anyone that the black boxes made out of the most resiliant material known to man was completely destroyed... but a paper book survived? It doesn't make sense... And thats just one of the hundreds of things that don't match up... When you check the airlines archives and flight plans... two of the planes were not even scheduled to be in use on 9/11... and even then, the departure and actual takeoff times do not match the distance travelled and time of impact? How does that work? The passengers on the flight that crashed, who supposidly faught back? Cell phone records indicate some calls lasting up to 25 minutes... the Fed's claim most calls only last average of 4 minutes... one call that was recorded, the guy phoned his mother and introduced himself using his full name... how many of you phone your parents and say "mom? this is FirstName Lastname"... surely your mother knows your name, let alone your voice? In another phone call a flight attendant tells her ground manager there are 4 terrorists on the plane, and even states which rows they are sitting in... the Fed's claim there were 5 terrorists, and they claim they were all seated in the same row (opposing the attendants claims).
There are so many things wrong with this whole picture. None of what the Us government has released makes any sense... not to me anyway
What do you think, in all honesty... terror attack or something else?
Originally Posted by DingDong
Reply With Quote
Meh.
that one doesnt seem logical... who knows...
Bookmarks