Originally Posted by
jrandom
Aha! Not quite.
Crimes Act 1961 (as amended), part 7 s134:
"(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who has or attempts to have sexual intercourse with any girl of or over the age of 12 years and under the age of 16 years, not being his wife."
Right. So, starting position is, shag a chick under 16 and you're buggered. Figuratively speaking.
Now, the section continues:
"(3) It is a defence to a charge under this section if the person charged proves that the girl consented and that he is younger than the girl:"
So, if she's between 12 and 15, but you're younger, shag away, baby!
"Provided that proof of the said facts shall not be a defence if it is proved that such consent was obtained by a false and fraudulent representation as to the nature and quality of the act."
... but not if she only did it because you told her you wanted to play Doctors and Nurses.
"(4) It is a defence to a charge under this section if the person charged proves that the girl consented, that he was under the age of 21 years at the time of the commission of the act, and that he had reasonable cause to believe, and did believe, that the girl was of or over the age of 16 years"
And it might also be OK if you're under 21, and she had these ENORMOUS, you know... tracts of land, right, and she can hold two dozen Lion Reds without falling down, and... and... well, your Honour, let's face it - do YOU think she looks under 16?
"(7) No one shall be prosecuted for any offence against this section, except under paragraph (a) of subsection (2) thereof, unless the prosecution is commenced within 12 months from the time when the offence was committed."
Well, just look at you, you pimply little git. She wasn't exactly going to BRAG about it to everyone the NEXT DAY, now, was she?
Bookmarks