
Originally Posted by
Ixion
Because when posting on a forum one is "talking" to a (potentially) very large audience. And the exact composition is unknown. When posting I cannot know who is going to read what I post.
I regard KB as the cyber equivalent of the local pub (the public bar which OP so despises).I write as I would speak when chatting there to friends over a pint (Speights, of course) . I do not see why I should adopt a stilted and artificial mode of conversation , to please the whim of one person, who may not even read what I have written, when the tone is acceptable to the vast majority. The degree of vernacular on the site seems consistent across most of the members. It is only a few who have problems with it. Why should the many be constrained, forced to put themselves into a artificial and uncomfortable mode for the sake of a small minority.
If the small minority have issues with the conversational standards of the great majority, I suggest that the minority go elsewhere.
I note also that the OP did not complain on any high moral or religious grounds - he did not say that , for instance, blasphemy was hurtful to his religious beliefs (and even the Great Zed had no problems with the language of the site). rather his objections were that the tone of language was too "lower class" for his liking. If his gripe with the site is based on affected class discrimination, then the sooner he buggers off the better.
I thought you were the one to introduce class to this thread.
I can't see that he has mentioned it at all....but I'm happy to be corrected.
Are you saying that any conversation that you engage in without the use of swear words is stilted and artificial?
I'm sure I've seen plenty of posts from you without any profanities at all and I've found them to be free-flowing and natural in the main.
...she took the KT, and left me the Buell to ride....(Blues Brothers)
Bookmarks