Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 74

Thread: Nuclear power stations

  1. #16
    Join Date
    3rd August 2005 - 18:58
    Bike
    suzuki sv1000 k3
    Location
    auckland
    Posts
    80
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackbird View Post
    Nothing to do with bikes whatever, but I've just been looking at a French physics website where they have posted an amazing time sequence of the spread of radioactivity from Chernobyl: http://www.irsn.org/va/05_int/05_inf...hernobyl.shtm#. Virtually no-one in the Northern Hemisphere escaped. I've always been profoundly glad to be living Down Under but it was announced that the Aussies are looking at up to 25 nuclear stations on the eastern seaboard. And which way do the winds blow???
    kind of glad i left europe a couple of monhts before it happened. Dont want that kind of unhealthy glow thanks
    Its all about the game and how you play it.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    5th August 2005 - 14:30
    Bike
    Various
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    4,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Hitcher View Post
    Melt down, rather than blow up. But the chances of that happening are remote. The safety record of nuclear power stations is impressive, Three Mile Island and Chernobyl aside.
    Wasn't there an incident at Sellafield too?

    What do they do with the waste these days?
    Like doesn't it have to be stored for a farken long time?
    How is it stored?
    Quote Originally Posted by Tank
    You say "no one wants to fuck with some large bloke on a really angry sounding bike" but the truth of the matter is that you are a balding middle-aged ice-cream seller from Edgecume who wears a hello kitty t-shirt (in your profile pic) and your angry sounding bike is a fucken hyoshit - not some big assed harley with a human skull on the front.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    30th April 2004 - 12:26
    Bike
    '06 GT250
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by CaN View Post
    How is it stored?
    In concrete cases at places nobody would really want to visit. Most of aussie would be a perfect waste dump

  4. #19
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 18:04
    Bike
    Big, black and slow
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,997
    Being a small country with little money, we can't really afford one of those safe fusion power stations. However, there are some second hand one's available ex-soviet union that are quite cheap and will do the job fine. Of course you only get what you pay for and the chances of meltdown are quite high so best we stick one in Wellington. Two birds with one stone so to speak.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    4th May 2006 - 21:21
    Bike
    2006 BMW F800ST
    Location
    Southland
    Posts
    4,916
    The biggest pollutant from Nuclear power is paranoia - we can't be choosy - we don't have enough electricity...and Nuclear power is clean...really clean...even requires less oil based lubricants than wind power...destroys fewer natural habitats than hydro...etc.

    And contrary to NZ belief - you can't actually smell it on people's breath.
    In space, no one can smell your fart.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by LilSel View Post
    To generate enough power to meet demand. Australia may not have the natural resources that we do in order to generate power (Geothermal, Hydro, gas).
    They have decent gas and oil supplies dont they?

    Quote Originally Posted by ajturbo View Post
    well they don't seam to have any water..... and solar power seams tooooo clean
    They are a coastal nation, lots of water there, just have to harness the energy in a different way.

    And solar needs lots of money and space as its not that efficient. I find it funny that the greens suggest solar panels are the solution of all our problems yet their manufacture invovles lots of heavy metals etc and in the overall scheme of things they are a -ve impact on the environment...... but wouldn't let facts get in the way of the green party would we?

  7. #22
    Join Date
    10th August 2006 - 16:34
    Bike
    Bikeless @ Mo - Injured
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    932
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    They have decent gas and oil supplies dont they?
    One's that will last forever?? lol...
    Nuclear power would provide a reliable future means IF they were to start running out etc (maybe 10 years.. maybe 20 years.. or more.. *shrug*)

  8. #23
    Join Date
    22nd October 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Coromandel Town
    Posts
    4,420
    I'm fairly neutral about nuclear energy, especially if we run short of other sources. It is pretty safe but any engineer who has done a Hazops for new equipment will know about the risk/consequences matrix, i.e. risk might be low but consequences may be very high. Irrespective of safety, another thing which has been grossly underestimated is lifecycle cost of a nuke station. In particular, safely dismantling irradiated plant when it is has to be decommissioned. There are some interesting articles on this which are pretty appalling.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    10th August 2006 - 16:34
    Bike
    Bikeless @ Mo - Injured
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    932
    Im also in the middle on the subject.
    I work for generator/retailer of power... so depending on which generation company is building it... depends if I swing either way lol...

  10. #25
    Join Date
    1st November 2005 - 08:18
    Bike
    F-117.
    Location
    Banana Republic of NZ
    Posts
    7,048
    Quote Originally Posted by robnz View Post
    kind of glad i left europe a couple of monhts before it happened. Dont want that kind of unhealthy glow thanks
    Having travelled through that area 2 years afterwards...
    (might see if the testicles glow in the dark tonight...)
    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    ...one of those safe fusion power stations. However, there are some second hand one's available ex-soviet union that are quite cheap and will do the job fine.
    Since fusion has not been invented yet.... Fission is the only current option.
    There is a multi billion dollar multi-country research deal just been announced the other day. Led by....??? france (surprise surprise) ((deliberate non capitalisation of word)).
    Ex Soviet submarine reactors seem to be the cheap option. Unfortunately K-19 would have been the best bet for Wellington (the widowmaker...) but a Russion billionaire has purchased it.
    TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

  11. #26
    Join Date
    25th April 2006 - 15:56
    Bike
    Gerbil DNA 180
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    277
    Guys, as far as I know the only reason for the Tchernobyl explosion was an outrageous break of safety protocol. The only problem with the reactor itself was that it allowed to turn safety features off. Long story short, the communist party management was desperate to report something to the government for the anniversary of the revolution and they ordered an experiment potentially promising significant rise in power output. Since safety mechanisms didn't allow execution of such a dangerous operation, the shift boss ordered to override them. He gambled and lost.
    I am 99.9% sure that Aussies know better than this and if their reactors will have a big red button with big red marking "safety override - do not touch" they will not fiddle with it.
    "People are stupid ... almost anyone will believe almost anything. Because people are stupid, they will believe a lie because they want to believe it's true, or because they are afraid it might be true. People's heads are full of knowledge, facts, and beliefs, and most of it is false, yet they think it all true ... they can only rarely tell the difference between a lie and the truth, and yet they are confident they can, and so all are easier to fool." -- Wizard's First Rule

  12. #27
    Join Date
    30th April 2004 - 12:26
    Bike
    '06 GT250
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Street Gerbil View Post
    Guys, as far as I know the only reason for the Tchernobyl explosion was an outrageous break of safety protocol. The only problem with the reactor itself was that it allowed to turn safety features off. Long story short, the communist party management was desperate to report something to the government for the anniversary of the revolution and they ordered an experiment potentially promising significant rise in power output. Since safety mechanisms didn't allow execution of such a dangerous operation, the shift boss ordered to override them. He gambled and lost.
    I am 99.9% sure that Aussies know better than this and if their reactors will have a big red button with big red marking "safety override - do not touch" they will not fiddle with it.
    That, and the design of the reactor itself was bad, which is why only the russians built them.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 18:04
    Bike
    Big, black and slow
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by Swoop View Post
    Since fusion has not been invented yet.... Fission is the only current option.
    There is a multi billion dollar multi-country research deal just been announced the other day. Led by....??? france (surprise surprise) ((deliberate non capitalisation of word)).
    Ex Soviet submarine reacors seem to be the cheap option. Unfortunately K-19 would have been the best bet for Wellington (the widowmaker...) but a Russion billionaire has purchased it.
    Yes it has. Mr Fusion, a product by Black & Decker. $99.95 with a 12 minute warranty. Available from leading department stores.

    Thank you for the correction Professor Swoop. Actually, Fusion has been invented, it's just not perfected.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    3rd July 2003 - 12:00
    Bike
    Scorpio, XL1200N
    Location
    forests of azure
    Posts
    9,398
    Quote Originally Posted by Finn View Post
    fusion has been invented, it's just not perfected.
    Aye, to be sure, given that the only reliable method of fusion power generation pretty much lets it all out at once...
    kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
    - mikey

  15. #30
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 15:20
    Bike
    Cagiva Navigator 1000
    Location
    1A
    Posts
    1,603
    I'm still in the middle on this one as well. Saw lots of them in Europe and they seem to be accepted there. Used to often go around the Ekron holding pattern stacking up for approaches into Zurich. Spent a bit of time staring down the steaming cooling tower at around 4000ft, contemplating what happened at Chernobyl.
    If you love it, let it go. If it comes back to you, you've just high-sided!
    مافي مشكلة

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •