Accident - losing licence?

[enigma51]

I am not referring to accidents where there are aggravating factors such as drink involved.

You forgot the fine print!

[Sniper]

Oh, and just to set the record straight...they are not forgiven for Culloden.

I blame the First and Second World Wars. Not a cause mind you, but the after effects. (PT)

Ha you started it!!

Fair enough point, but mine was an honest observation with a semi consealed jibe at another ethnicity, yours was an all out jibe

[scracha]

It would never be so in the UK.

I beg to differ on that. After WW2 a few of the nazi's got into disguise and found jobs as English magistrates.

[marty]

I took myself out a few years ago, good cop came to see me in hospital saw the state of me and said he could do me for careless but wasn't going to. So yeah you can be done even if no-one else was involved.

yes you can be done for careless driving, but not for careless causing injury.

all dangerous/reckless/careless charges have an extension to dangerous/reckless/careless causing injury. the injury charge has a subsection 'causing death', which is often laid in the absence of a manslaughter charge.

[jonbuoy]

Fair enough point, but mine was an honest observation with a semi consealed jibe at another ethnicity, yours was an all out jibe

Bollocks, yours was a wind up and so was mine!

[Mom]

Women shouldn't be allowed to drive anyway. The vote was enough, now look what they're doing to us.

basically you guys are........

[Mom]

Half the problem is lawyers making a fortune getting loser pissheads (often repeat offenders) off charges on a stupid procedural technicality - notwithstanding the clear fact that the 'client' was drunk as a skunk and may have killed and hurt others, or cost us taxpayers millions.

Please dont start the Lawyer thang up...........LOL......not sure how some actually lie straight in bed at night to be honest.......

[moko]

Oh, and just to set the record straight...they are not forgiven for Culloden.

Culloden`s a great example of facts being twisted to suit,take a look at Battle of Culloden on Wikipedia and have a look at just how many Scots fought for the "English" side.You`ll find a classic case of denial over this inconvienient fact in Scotland,same as you dont tend to find too many Maori bragging about how well their ancestors fought on the British side during the Maori Wars.We can learn a lot from history,not much from selective history.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_...overnment_Army