gsxr 400rr was a 94 sling shot( lite wise) grunt was good for a 400 was restricted to 205 from memory , only had for a short time about 6wks( before getting rear ended at carbine rd lights) ( wrote off bike and cage) so had no real problems to write of, still enjoyed the vfr the best,although the hot cbr was faster,
i should have said was, if you are moving on from a 250 inline four, go for a 600. I dont beleive the power increase from 250 to 400 is a lot, and you will soon get bored with it. The 600's have unbelievable power, and can show a few 750's or 1000's how its done.
I only bought my 400 as i was coming back to road riding and had always thought the VFR were pretty cool. But i do miss the power and laziness of riding style that my 600 had.
You have to ride the VFR fairly hard through the gears if you want it to boogie.
That's really a subjective question and depends on a number of factors;
- Your height / weight
The 400s all mentioned above are fairly small bikes physically, and if you're a slightly larger chap you might want to look at 600s as they are usually bigger.
- Your riding style
The 400s will cruise fairly well on the motorway, but are best in the twisties, the 400s in the twisties over the coro for example will keep pace with 600s and most others (dependant on the rider of course)
- Your riding ability
You'll find the 400s are a very forgiving bike, they've got enough power that they can move if you want them to, but it's also small enough that it's difficult to get into a really sticky situation by accident, I've found my ZX4R gives me plenty of notice if it's not happy with the lean it's on for example, and plenty of time to pull it back into line.
- Where you normally ride
You'll find most 400s are carbed, and in colder climates this can be a bit of a pain, but this only favours the 600s if they were fuel injected, in fact the carbed 600s are even worse in colder climates to get running well. The 400s will generally cruise easily in and out of town, only requiring the odd high speed run to clear out any cobwebs it may have built up.
My personal recommendation...
If you're over six foot tall, or more than 100kgs, you'll find the 400 might not be to your requirements, but anyone else that is coming back to biking, or fancies an easy trade up from a 250 will really enjoy it.
As with anything, test before you buy, the 400 doesn't take much to reach it's limits really, so you probably won't keep it for more than a year or two, but same goes for most bikes really.
Well I've just grown past 6' and I'm still going (my cousins that I seem to be following are 6'4") but I'm 75kg (haven't had christmas dinner yet). Being restricted to the 150/250s has got me yearning for more power and I think 400s wouldn't be so big a jump and I'll get tired of it easily. I haven't got my full yet, but I've been riding for nearly 5 years and I'm fairly sensible so I think I can handle a 600 (or a 1000 if I was dumb enough to get one. Which I might be cause those early 2000 R1s are getting cheap).
Money will probably decide. Once I've fixed up the RGs I could get over 2000 each which will just be enough for a decent 400. Plus I hope to save up some cash. I've still got another 6-12 months to think about things. I don't mind riding a learners bike on my full for a bit longer
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks