Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 102

Thread: Best 400

  1. #46
    Join Date
    11th June 2005 - 14:42
    Bike
    2005 Honda CBR600RR
    Location
    Otahuhu
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by Weasel View Post
    I've done it a few times, mostly coro loops or the back stright on puke or taupo, it ain't hard to hit 190kph on those, even with my fat ass on the back.
    My ZXR400 (SP admittedly) hit 200 kph at Puke, just. Great bike the Kawasaki.
    Sleep is for the weak.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    19th November 2003 - 18:45
    Bike
    KTM 690 DUKE R
    Location
    Auckland - unavoidably...
    Posts
    6,422
    Quote Originally Posted by steved View Post
    My ZXR400 (SP admittedly) hit 200 kph at Puke, just. Great bike the Kawasaki.
    on the speedo? or some other method?

    As mines been past 180 past the kmhr bit and on past Nippon on the speedo,

  3. #48
    Join Date
    22nd October 2006 - 08:48
    Bike
    SLOW ONE
    Location
    ORINI VILLAGE
    Posts
    635
    Quote Originally Posted by mynameis View Post
    How did it feel like a 250 and in what way mate? You mean grunt wise or was it light? Any other comments on GSXR 400? What year did you have? Common problems? I hear it's top end is the best out of all 400's?

    mynameis
    gsxr 400rr was a 94 sling shot( lite wise) grunt was good for a 400 was restricted to 205 from memory , only had for a short time about 6wks( before getting rear ended at carbine rd lights) ( wrote off bike and cage) so had no real problems to write of, still enjoyed the vfr the best,although the hot cbr was faster,

  4. #49
    Join Date
    11th June 2005 - 14:42
    Bike
    2005 Honda CBR600RR
    Location
    Otahuhu
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    on the speedo? or some other method?

    As mines been past 180 past the kmhr bit and on past Nippon on the speedo,
    Hand-held GPS in the pocket. I don't think the speedo goes that high although I can't remember. Klown?
    Sleep is for the weak.

  5. #50
    Join Date
    7th July 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,460
    Quote Originally Posted by sAsLEX View Post
    on the speedo? or some other method?

    As mines been past 180 past the kmhr bit and on past Nippon on the speedo,
    Quote Originally Posted by steved View Post
    Hand-held GPS in the pocket. I don't think the speedo goes that high although I can't remember. Klown?

    Yeh, speedo tops out at 180kph, and on a 12 year old bike can be a tad unreliable... I'd believe 200kph though, dependant on if you're over the tank and weigh slightly less than I do

  6. #51
    Join Date
    6th February 2006 - 19:16
    Bike
    SV1000, RMZ250
    Location
    Shore
    Posts
    777

    what

    Quote Originally Posted by 99TLS View Post
    thats because its a 400 ya knob
    i should have said was, if you are moving on from a 250 inline four, go for a 600. I dont beleive the power increase from 250 to 400 is a lot, and you will soon get bored with it. The 600's have unbelievable power, and can show a few 750's or 1000's how its done.
    I only bought my 400 as i was coming back to road riding and had always thought the VFR were pretty cool. But i do miss the power and laziness of riding style that my 600 had.
    You have to ride the VFR fairly hard through the gears if you want it to boogie.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by steved View Post
    My ZXR400 (SP admittedly) hit 200 kph at Puke, just. Great bike the Kawasaki.
    So the 400s aren't that much faster than the 250s?

    I got to just under 200 on my old CBR (according to the speedo)

  8. #53
    Join Date
    7th July 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    So the 400s aren't that much faster than the 250s?
    Top speed maybe, but they'll get there a lot quicker... my 400 will outrun 250s in a line piece of piss.

  9. #54
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by Weasel View Post
    Top speed maybe, but they'll get there a lot quicker... my 400 will outrun 250s in a line piece of piss.
    So it's worth upgrading to a 400 instead of a 600? I won't have to loan cash to get a 400

  10. #55
    Join Date
    11th June 2005 - 14:42
    Bike
    2005 Honda CBR600RR
    Location
    Otahuhu
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    So the 400s aren't that much faster than the 250s?

    I got to just under 200 on my old CBR (according to the speedo)
    As Saslex pointed out, the speedo isn't a great indication of speed up top.
    I think a standard CBR250 would struggle to top 180 in reality.
    Sleep is for the weak.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by steved View Post
    As Saslex pointed out, the speedo isn't a great indication of speed up top.
    I think a standard CBR250 would struggle to top 180 in reality.
    I think it would get to 180, but that would be it. I ran out of road before I hit the limiter

    And so would a ZXR250 A/C, before some tosser goes on about how much better they are which is bull

  12. #57
    Join Date
    11th June 2005 - 14:42
    Bike
    2005 Honda CBR600RR
    Location
    Otahuhu
    Posts
    540
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    So it's worth upgrading to a 400 instead of a 600? I won't have to loan cash to get a 400
    I went CBR250, ZXR400 then CBR600. The 400 is still 40%ish more power than a 250 so is a nice step up.
    Sleep is for the weak.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    7th July 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    So it's worth upgrading to a 400 instead of a 600? I won't have to loan cash to get a 400
    That's really a subjective question and depends on a number of factors;

    - Your height / weight

    The 400s all mentioned above are fairly small bikes physically, and if you're a slightly larger chap you might want to look at 600s as they are usually bigger.

    - Your riding style

    The 400s will cruise fairly well on the motorway, but are best in the twisties, the 400s in the twisties over the coro for example will keep pace with 600s and most others (dependant on the rider of course)

    - Your riding ability

    You'll find the 400s are a very forgiving bike, they've got enough power that they can move if you want them to, but it's also small enough that it's difficult to get into a really sticky situation by accident, I've found my ZX4R gives me plenty of notice if it's not happy with the lean it's on for example, and plenty of time to pull it back into line.

    - Where you normally ride

    You'll find most 400s are carbed, and in colder climates this can be a bit of a pain, but this only favours the 600s if they were fuel injected, in fact the carbed 600s are even worse in colder climates to get running well. The 400s will generally cruise easily in and out of town, only requiring the odd high speed run to clear out any cobwebs it may have built up.

    My personal recommendation...

    If you're over six foot tall, or more than 100kgs, you'll find the 400 might not be to your requirements, but anyone else that is coming back to biking, or fancies an easy trade up from a 250 will really enjoy it.

    As with anything, test before you buy, the 400 doesn't take much to reach it's limits really, so you probably won't keep it for more than a year or two, but same goes for most bikes really.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Well I've just grown past 6' and I'm still going (my cousins that I seem to be following are 6'4") but I'm 75kg (haven't had christmas dinner yet). Being restricted to the 150/250s has got me yearning for more power and I think 400s wouldn't be so big a jump and I'll get tired of it easily. I haven't got my full yet, but I've been riding for nearly 5 years and I'm fairly sensible so I think I can handle a 600 (or a 1000 if I was dumb enough to get one. Which I might be cause those early 2000 R1s are getting cheap).

    Money will probably decide. Once I've fixed up the RGs I could get over 2000 each which will just be enough for a decent 400. Plus I hope to save up some cash. I've still got another 6-12 months to think about things. I don't mind riding a learners bike on my full for a bit longer

  15. #60
    Join Date
    7th July 2005 - 12:00
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,460
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    I'm fairly sensible so I think I can handle a 600 (or a 1000 if I was dumb enough to get one. Which I might be cause those early 2000 R1s are getting cheap).
    Mate... I'd very strongly advise against an R1 stright off a 250, 400s might be a little too soft, but see how it goes eh.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •