That's a fair rule that everyone on this forum should live by.Originally Posted by dangerous
That's a fair rule that everyone on this forum should live by.Originally Posted by dangerous
Where did I call you a dork?Originally Posted by dangerous
I don't believe you'd posted before I used that word (and if you read the post properly, you'll see I qualified it in the next sentence).
Still, if the cap fits...
Ohh.... it doe's, it's yoursOriginally Posted by Oscar
![]()
cheers DD
(Definately Dodgy)
Witty remarks are generally more effective with correct spelling.Originally Posted by dangerous
That's not to say that your spelling alone qualifies you as a dork, that's down to your pompous attitude...
Yeah Merv.... but there is the problem, 'I' like the majority here have after market pipes but I do NOT 'abuse' anything or anyone, so why would you smile if I was to lose my pipes?Originally Posted by merv
Like I said above the one twit in a thour that does abuse there noise limits will screw it up for the rest of us.
I ask you guys that protest after market pipes, does every snigle noisie pipe out there piss the hell out of you? or is it the odd a-hole that winds the crap out of there bike/car in the middle of the night in a quite family style st that piss's you off?
My long winded point here is, its not the noisie pipe that is the problem its the person riding/driving it.
cheers DD
(Definately Dodgy)
Now you are just getting personal......... I am above that so I'll leave you to it.Originally Posted by Oscar
Anyone else think that I am pompous.....LMFAO
And um... gee, sorry please remove the ' from does as I dont want to upset anyone.
cheers DD
(Definately Dodgy)
That hypocrisy exist here, and most places the brethen gather. They crap on about "cages" and harsh law enforcement etc, then brag about the wheelies they pull in town and their high speed antics on public roads...Originally Posted by merv
Actually the Kiwi Rider guys (John Nic in particular) were in the vanguard of the anti-noise push off-road, and I'm sure it has helped us to retain access to a lot of land over the years. I recall decibel meters being used at enduro's in the late '80's.
Past your bedtime?Originally Posted by dangerous
![]()
How loud in dB is a jet engine then??Originally Posted by Oscar
And i dont consider my bikes exhaust stupidly loud either jus a nice note and it does get me noticed on the road around here which is a good thing as the amount of accidents caused by cage drivers not looking is huge.
And the other down side to the law is for the real motorsport guys, how would you distingish between a rice racer and a person who is really into thier motorsport and drag races and attends track days. They have loud exhaust and they cars have mags and are lowered and so on, so how do you know if it is jus a ricer or someone who uses these add-ons properly (i no generally ricers rev the crap out of it full time but from looks how do u tell).
Originally Posted by Wenier
Jet engine at take off - 140dB.
You’ve never considered the possibility that these people whose attention you get with your pipes, are looking around in annoyance? People who shake their heads, muttering “..bloody bikies…” and stalk off to write to their MPs?
What about the possibility that the Backwardscap&Hoody Brigade in their RX7's are making more noise than you? How do you get them to "notice" you?
It most certainly is. Had to do a mad dash to the Countdown, and got drenched. Still not too cold though (for Christchurch at the end of July).Originally Posted by dangerous
*Drools over wet weather gear.... one day my precious*
Check out the speedway guys - like Oscar says about enduros,decibel meters were at speedway tracks in the 80s,now all speedway bikes have mufflers.When Ivan Major put on the long track at Claudlands about 10yrs ago he had everyone put a hugemungous car muffler on their speedway bikes,no complaints,and the speed of the bikes wasn't effected to much - 100mph on a trotting track is worth seeing anyway.To answer your question - the real motorsport guys show responsability.Originally Posted by Wenier
In and out of jobs, running free
Waging war with society
Just thought I'd throw a couple of things into the debate.
Last year in Europe, the emissions regs were tightened so much that certain bikes were taken out of the marketplace. We're talking about bikes like the Fazer and CB500 here (and I think the ZX7R went to its grave for the same reason) amongst others. In 3 years time, the emissions regs here will get so tight that most bikes in current production will fail them.
The EU is putting pressure on US to fall in line. It'll happen eventually. So ALL bikes will be made meeting these regs.
Aside from the above - which'll see everyone being forced to have quieter, cleaner bikes (and there are threats of taxing older bikes that will not meet the new levels - effectively a 'pollution tax', so it'll cost you to ride a bike that isn't antiseptically clean.), only my point of view, but personally I'm happy to have a fairly quiet bike - quieter bike, more chance of being able to hear as I get older.
As someone else said, if you want to make a noise, hit your horn. If your horn isn't loud enough, why not fit a louder one? Damn sight cheaper than an aftermarket can.
If an aftermarket can meets the emissions regs and is louder than OE, then great. If it isn't road-legal, then apart from anything else, you just invalidated your insurance.
There was a recent article here about someone who had a really loud can on their bike... something that, lets face it, you can't really pick up on that well yourself when you are riding. So they were taken on track with an exhaust modified so that the RIDER was getting all the noise. Guess what? They didn't like it!
Not trying for a public service announcement here - but as a group us bikers really don't do ourselves any favours. It isn't the 'nice car' that gets remembered for making a noise when they scream through a town or village at twice the limit, it is the 'nasty bike' that will be mentioned in complaints.
For good or bad, we are still tarred with the same brush that was used in the 50s and 60s... and if we do our best to act up to it, we'll continue to suffer the consequences.
Just my viewpoint, for what it is worth.
http://www.motobke.co.uk
I'm in two minds about the issue; on one hand there's nothing like certain loudish exhaust sounds, V's of all types, high revving 4's etc. Then I hear some twat with just a resonator on his Honda Civic or Rotary or a Harley with straight pipes and I just want them banned.
In the few times I've been in Oz, one very noticable thing was the absence of objectionably loud exhausts, it was very pleasant eating lunch outside without being deafened by screaming exhausts or thumping bass drivers.
If they do bring in Db testing, how are Ferrari's, Ducati's etc. going to pass?
That's why the tests have to be performed at certain rpm ranges. You'll find that performance exhausts on European sports cars have, for a long time, been within the European rules (90 or 91 Db, I can't remember exactly) at the test rpm range. It's only under high rpm or large load that they exceed the number - precisely the point people have been making about _when_ a sports exhaust is loud.Originally Posted by Lou Girardin
There shouldn't be any reason for someone to not be able to run a pipe that meets the standard at 'normal use' rev ranges for city driving, but still allow the pipe(s) to have a suitable bark when at the track (or when you're galavanting around country roads). It's certainly not impossible, nor impractical for a test like this to be performed - and it is done this way in some countries.
In fact, you will see some OEM pipes with a standards stamp which states it meets this very standard (I once had an OEM RF600 exhaust put on an old gixxer - *ahem* don't ask!). It was a US standards met pipe, which did not exceed 89Db (on an RF600, I imagine) at the test rpm speed of x rpm.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks