Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: NSR SE & SP, any difference?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 10:14
    Bike
    '01 VTR SP1, '92 NSR300, rm125,
    Location
    shitsville
    Posts
    353

    NSR SE & SP, any difference?

    yeh im kinda on the whole *nsr* buzz at the moment,
    i duno the diference between the SE and SP models...

    can someone shed some light plz, cheers

  2. #2
    Join Date
    21st June 2005 - 20:11
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,929
    Theres the NSR250R which has a wet clutch and alloy wheels, the NSR250SE with a dry clutch and alloys, and the SP is the same as the SE except it has magnesium wheels.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    24th September 2006 - 02:00
    Bike
    -
    Location
    -
    Posts
    4,736
    This is probably not the most appropriate thread, but MrPeanut I noticed that in your video you had a dry clutch -- what is the advantage of a dry clutch? I mean the advantage to having magnesium wheels is obvious, but what's the advantage in having a dry clutch for a race rep?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by MrPeanut View Post
    Theres the NSR250R which has a wet clutch and alloy wheels, the NSR250SE with a dry clutch and alloys, and the SP is the same as the SE except it has magnesium wheels.
    So the SP is the one to get?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    19th October 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    1998 suzuki RG150e (AETC)... X2
    Location
    Canterbury University
    Posts
    427
    Quote Originally Posted by xerxesdaphat View Post
    This is probably not the most appropriate thread, but MrPeanut I noticed that in your video you had a dry clutch -- what is the advantage of a dry clutch? I mean the advantage to having magnesium wheels is obvious, but what's the advantage in having a dry clutch for a race rep?
    they sound cool?
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    So the SP is the one to get?
    yep
    I suffer from hooliganism.... Know me before you judge me
    http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...7&postcount=83
    i need to practice my "this shit doesn't burn" face
    Welcome, ZorsT.
    You last visited: 1st November 2007 at 22:15

  6. #6
    Join Date
    17th April 2006 - 10:14
    Bike
    '01 VTR SP1, '92 NSR300, rm125,
    Location
    shitsville
    Posts
    353
    how convienient, only 24 hours to go......

  7. #7
    Join Date
    21st June 2005 - 20:11
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    1,929
    You can just put RS250 wheels on an SE (same thing). Dry clutch doesn't sap as much power from the drivetrain, give you 1-2hp more at the wheels.

    I prefer the feel of the dry clutch too, lots of feedback, very progressive.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    26th July 2005 - 12:12
    Bike
    Aprilia Shiver 750, Suzuki RG150E
    Location
    Newdlands, Welly...
    Posts
    5,480
    Ha ha ha,...my Guzzi is a V-Twin too and has a dry clutch which rattles away at the lights while in first gear....

    Not quite the same though is it...


    "...you meet the weirdest people riding a Guzzi !!..."

  9. #9
    Join Date
    31st January 2006 - 18:39
    Bike
    06 Yammie R1, 07 Husky WR250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by Coyote View Post
    So the SP is the one to get?
    No, the SE is. Magnesium wheels are (IMHO) too fragile for general road use (especially in NZ).

  10. #10
    Join Date
    17th February 2005 - 11:36
    Bike
    Bikes!
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    9,649
    Proper magnesium wheels degrade over time don't they? Which is another reason why they're only used on race vehicles, and everything else is 'alloy' wheels? I seem to remember something from PB a looong time ago, anybody shed any light?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    31st January 2006 - 18:39
    Bike
    06 Yammie R1, 07 Husky WR250
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    389
    Quote Originally Posted by imdying View Post
    Proper magnesium wheels degrade over time don't they? Which is another reason why they're only used on race vehicles, and everything else is 'alloy' wheels? I seem to remember something from PB a looong time ago, anybody shed any light?
    I've seen some scary pictures of shattered ones at the IOM TT. Some of them wouldn't have been survivable.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    8th August 2004 - 17:16
    Bike
    1999 GSXR1100W, 1975 CT90
    Location
    Upper Hutt
    Posts
    5,551
    Quote Originally Posted by Paulus View Post
    No, the SE is. Magnesium wheels are (IMHO) too fragile for general road use (especially in NZ).
    Oh right, fair enough

    What about carbon fibre? Some of those Dymag rims look awesome

  13. #13
    Join Date
    28th December 2004 - 19:18
    Bike
    06 r6, 690 ktm duke 3, rs125
    Location
    nelson
    Posts
    736
    r= wet clutch, alloy wheels and preload only adjustable suspension

    se= dry clutch, alloy wheels, and fully adjustable suspension

    sp= dry clutch, fully adjustable suspension, magnesium wheels, identified by the "magtek" embosed on the spoke, about 500g lighter than alloy wheel, still quite heavy and fine for road use, but it is wise to touch up any chips in the paint

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •