Guys I think you are Missing My point.
There is NO argument that the car driver hit TS and "caused" the accident
As in TS could have been doing a handstand on the bars and it would still have happened.
BUT Insurance companies look for any excuse to get out of paying out.
If TS's actions could have contributed to the accident they will do their best not to payout.
Also he could be prosecuted as a result of admitting to "careless" use of a motor vehicle.
As an example I had an accident years ago. -The other party was the "innocent" victim but got prosecuted on 3 counts by the police.
-carrying 6 passengers all unlicenced on a learner licence, No WOF and NO rego.
Their insurance company also refused to pay out.
For the record the accident was caused by diesel oil dropped on the road causing me to slide across the center line into the oncoming traffic
To see a life newly created.To watch it grow and prosper. Isn't that the greatest gift a human being can be given?
Bookmarks