Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 54

Thread: Should 4x4's be taxed higher?

  1. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
    If you have a legitimate use, tow something, live up shit street, whatever, and they are the most appropriate vehicle - I'm glad it's you paying for the fuel - party on.
    Defiantly the most appropriate vehicle for me,and for most other people who drive them too I expect.I put 100,000km on my Pajero in 2 1/2 years,mostly single occupant,mostly open road.....and compared to the NX Coupe I also have,they cost about the same to run.I have carried a shit load of stuff,including people...some of it was filthy,I have towed trailers loaded with various things,including motorcycles....some of them were filthy,it has also towed caravans and cars.I'm really grateful to the Pajero for putting in such hard work for me over a difficult period of my life,I really don't know what I would of done without it.It can go into retirement now,instead of 1,000km weeks it will be lucky to do 10km in a week now

    I think people who can afford to buy bikes worth nearly $20,000 should be audited by the Inland Revenue weekly....
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  2. #17
    Join Date
    26th September 2004 - 11:51
    Bike
    '90 GSXR250 in black
    Location
    Dunnas
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by dogsnbikes View Post
    As 4x4 owner,I feel that the prices are high enoughwhen paying on gross weight ........as I live in country its a suitable cage for me and having a St Bernard in a toymota just doesn't work
    ever thought of a station wagon??
    http://thenc30project.blogspot.com/

    Popping wheelies on sj50's since 2003
    Code:
    if (user.postcount > user.yearsriding*user.ccrating) {
    user = kiwibiker.postwhore}

  3. #18
    Join Date
    2nd November 2005 - 07:09
    Bike
    2001 DUCATI 900SS
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand, Ne
    Posts
    4,219
    So do you include People Carriers too?

  4. #19
    Join Date
    2nd November 2005 - 07:09
    Bike
    2001 DUCATI 900SS
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand, Ne
    Posts
    4,219
    Do they wear roads out quicker. There are already new holes appearing in Esdmond Road.................maybe they should make better roads?

    Anyway this is still a 3rd world country so what's wrong with 4X4's......

  5. #20
    Join Date
    23rd November 2003 - 21:16
    Bike
    big red one, rgv's, kdx's
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    690
    I wouldnt tax 4wd's as a rule, I would be more inclined to tax vehicles at different weight limits. First 1000kgs and below, 1000 to 1500kgs, 1500 to 2000kgs etc etc. Id hate to think what my 4wd would cost tax wise.

    They had a tax system in holland based on weight years back, a mate of mine had a VW and removed EVERYTHING when taking the car in and running on fumes.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    18th February 2007 - 22:47
    Bike
    RATS & RICE
    Location
    .
    Posts
    2,142
    Blog Entries
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by gamgee View Post
    ever thought of a station wagon??
    Had station wagon but too small for dog and and crap traction on dirt tracks

  7. #22
    I've got a van,and I think it does a better job of hauling loads than the Pajero,it's a real little workhorse....but it's not comfortable,and can get stuck on a flat lawn.Plus it's only a 2 seater.We've had stationwagons as family vehicles and they are great,no problem there.I really liked my Escort van,it was surprising what could fit in it,and it was fun to drive,but again only a 2 seater.The Pajero offers the comfort and versatility no other vehicle can.....I'll hang onto it a little longer.
    In and out of jobs, running free
    Waging war with society

  8. #23
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    I will, indeed , take an entirely reverse position.

    If you have a bike, what is the point of owning a "standard car" ? You can't get much more into it than the bike (especially with a side car). Not worth it. Whereas a 4x4 DOES give you options that the bike does not. Towing, lugging heeavy dirty stuff, carting 6 passengers etc. So it is worth owning a 4x4.

    So for bikers , the logical combo is a bike plus a 4x4.

    If you DON'T have a bike then of course you are an inferior species and your opinion does not count.

    So all that is required is to make a class 6 licence a requirement for driving a 4x4. No problem for bikers, everybody else out. Sorted.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  9. #24
    Join Date
    6th October 2005 - 21:45
    Bike
    none for now
    Location
    tauranga
    Posts
    581
    And as for fuel economy I used to have a 2.8L diesel bighorn that did over 1000km on 75L of diesel. Thats better economy then my gsxr gets!

  10. #25
    Join Date
    21st August 2004 - 12:00
    Bike
    2017 Suzuki Dl1000
    Location
    Picton
    Posts
    5,177
    you must spread some reputation around before giving it to Ixion again
    Time to ride

  11. #26
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Motu View Post

    I think people who can afford to buy bikes worth nearly $20,000 should be audited by the Inland Revenue weekly....
    I can afford bikes worth a lot more than that. Pay my GST bi-monthly too

  12. #27
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post

    So for bikers , the logical combo is a bike plus a 4x4.

    Sorted.

    No fuckin' way. Big rolling tankers of things - I get sea sick in 'em. It has to be pissing down or no other option before I'll get in one.

    A bike and another bike thanks.

  13. #28
    Join Date
    26th February 2005 - 15:10
    Bike
    Ubrfarter V Klunkn,ffwabbit,Petal,phoebe
    Location
    In the cave of Adullam
    Posts
    13,624
    Well, I'm not saying a biker HAS to have a 4x4. But if you *do* want another vehicle beside the bike(s) , then a 4x4 makes far more sense than a car.

    And only bikers can show a valid justification for a 4x4 , cos they are already doing their bit toward transportation efficiency.
    Quote Originally Posted by skidmark
    This world has lost it's drive, everybody just wants to fit in the be the norm as it were.
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil Vincent
    The manufacturers go to a lot of trouble to find out what the average rider prefers, because the maker who guesses closest to the average preference gets the largest sales. But the average rider is mainly interested in silly (as opposed to useful) “goodies” to try to kid the public that he is riding a racer

  14. #29
    Join Date
    18th March 2007 - 15:50
    Bike
    2015 f800gt
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    88
    Food for thought for both sides of the fence here. I hate the bloody things in town. cant see around/through, studies have proven that the majority of owners are agressive males in their 30s (ie people that cant drive for shit and give you the finger after cutting you off) on the open road they dont handle as well as a car and never will, their design inherintly compromises their on road handling. yet uneducated poor quality nz drivers still drive them like they stole them and when they realise they dont pull as well as a car do dangerous things like overtaking on blind corners. By far the dangerous idiotic stuff I see on the road is by these vehicles.

    However in saying that, I am heading into places like the kaimanwas, more and more doing deer hunting etc. Some places that I want to visit in the future require 4x4 access unless you want to walk another 5 or 6 hours. Looking at my options, I wanted a 4x4 station wagon, diesel and manual. guess what. they dont exist. next step is something like a subaru, which MAY be able to handle a little mud, things like riverbeds will shake it to pieces. Next option is a hilux or a navara. nope too expensive, they hold their value to well. Holden mazda or mitsi, no thanks, shite and ill end up walking the extra 5 or 6 hours anyway. So the only thing that I can afford that fills the requirements is something like an iszuzu mu. Bugger.

    I have done a 4wd through NZDF, and I REALLY wouldnt want a petrol 4wd. after experiancing the abuse that is needed to get a vehicle in certain places, things like a subaru or even 4wd caldina which I was looking at would just destroy them. plus subarus etc dont come in diesel which is one of my requirements.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    3rd January 2005 - 11:00
    Bike
    All of them
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    12,472
    Quote Originally Posted by Ixion View Post
    Well, I'm not saying a biker HAS to have a 4x4. But if you *do* want another vehicle beside the bike(s) , then a 4x4 makes far more sense than a car.

    And only bikers can show a valid justification for a 4x4 , cos they are already doing their bit toward transportation efficiency.
    Now yer talkin' - What about for every motorcycle you own you get a rebate.

    It will be like child support in Oz - bang out enough and the child support adds up to a working wage.

    We could do it with bikes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •