Yes, but the "hump" is an integral part of the rider's leathers, and it sits higher up the rider's back than does a backpack AND it's deliberately intended to mitigate the sort of head-snap injury that concerns me. I cannot for one moment see how a Barbie bag that's slung over a rider's shoulders could even attempt to provide the same level of protection.
"Standing on your mother's corpse you told me that you'd wait forever." [Bryan Adams: Summer of 69]
I thought it was there for erobar(tm)dynamics.
And regarding a backpack catching??? there are about a thousand threads that are likly to break and rip before you reach the webbing frame that connects to the straps.
I would have thought having a laptop of hard leather folder in your backpack would be a safety feature as if hit something on your back it would spread the impact across a greater surface area???
I am guessing landing on a lunch box would hurt.
Need something to do when not riding??? Come and learn to dance with us at www.cerocstars.co.nz
Ah, I think I get it. Why don't you guys just spit it out - no need to be so cryptic - how's a young grasshopper like me ever going to learn from you.![]()
So the back protector's role is to prevent a certain scenario when you have an off - say landing face first and the back of your legs try to say hello to the back of your head?![]()
I can see how a backpack is not going to be much use in preventing that. So then we should all be wearing back protectors - all the gear all the time?![]()
*goes to see how much back protectors cost*
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.
- Dr. Suess
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks