Against the law.. apparently. I had red ones on my R6. Seems that's illegal too. No pleasing some people!
Against the law.. apparently. I had red ones on my R6. Seems that's illegal too. No pleasing some people!
It's only when you take the piss out of a partially shaved wookie with an overactive 'me' gene and stapled on piss flaps that it becomes a problem.

If a man is alone in the woods and there isn't a woke Hollywood around to call him racist, is he still white?

I can't help but agree here, to a certain extent. EG; If I didn't have to, I probably wouldn't wear a helmet all the time; I think (because of the number of idiots) in the cities it's a damn good idea, and, for the most part coz of bugs and stones etc, on the highways too, but there are occasions when I like to go without. (Riding the hydro causeways down south for example, sheer brilliance lidless, bugger all traffic, great roads) I also get a bit miffed with GST being applied to compulsory safety items. If this wasn't the case many, I'm sure, would go to better equipment because they can. It's sometimes hard to juggle the cash on that fine line to be legal/safe.
There's something on TV3 about it in a minute.. after the adverts.
It's only when you take the piss out of a partially shaved wookie with an overactive 'me' gene and stapled on piss flaps that it becomes a problem.
No useful facts. Fucking shock..
It's only when you take the piss out of a partially shaved wookie with an overactive 'me' gene and stapled on piss flaps that it becomes a problem.
AArg, my mum just saw that Crash Test thing on the TV, called me to nag me to be careful... But I guess all awareness is good.
Determined to kill my bike before it kills me
Saw the TV3 story. You Auckland riders are..f@*#ed!. Take the bus.
Happiness is a means of travel, not a destination
Saw a biggish convoy of police-escorted bikes cruise past work about 12.15 today.
Looks like it was part of some publicity thing for this.
Your maths is still dodgy.
If you're trying to say that only the 25% of crashes actually caused by motorcyclists should be assessed in terms of true costs to ACC (which is bollocks) then it would come out as:
$52,000,000 /(.25*43,000) = $4837.29 per naughty motorcyclist.
Of course, you spread the risk over all licence payers, which means the cost to ACC averaged over EVERY motorcycle licence payer is:
($52,000,000 /43,000)-$166.00 = $1043.30 per motorcyclist.
So, maybe, just maybe, we ARE costing ACC a hell of a lot more than we bring in? The cagers are subsidising us to the tune of more than a grand per motorcyclist. How many car ACC licence fees is that?
Still think they're arseholes for trying to inform the public to look out for you?![]()
And I to my motorcycle parked like the soul of the junkyard. Restored, a bicycle fleshed with power, and tore off. Up Highway 106 continually drunk on the wind in my mouth. Wringing the handlebar for speed, wild to be wreckage forever.
- James Dickey, Cherrylog Road.
Saw a short (25 second) artical on this on the TV1 news this evening. Like the headline from the Herald article mentioned earlier, the TV report was miles off the point.
They reported "a motorbikes plunge from above, today, to demonstrate the dangers of being on two wheels" and "43 motorcycle accidents have occured in blackspots around Auckland in the past five years. The crashes are reported to have cost the taxpayer nearly a million dollars".
What they completely missed was the launch of the ACC campaign about looking out for bikes and how the crash display and motorcycle convoy through Auckland were a part of the educational campaign.
Poor form![]()
Last edited by Kinje; 12th June 2007 at 22:16. Reason: Entered quotes from report
We do not live to eat and make money. We eat and make money to be able to enjoy life. George Leigh Mallory, 1922
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks