Ah, the great debate continues......
I rode both bikes and debated hotly which one would be better. For equal years, the Hornet was another 1500-2000 dearer, but the main consideration was as to how they rode, which essentially mirrors the V-Twin/Inline 4 debate, which I'll summarise for you.
V-twins are all about torque. You can be almost idling in a high-ish gear, wind it on and it'll pull away quite happily. The power delivery is very linear, which means that it's fairly constant, so when the throttles open you know what's coming up. I like it in the fact that I can go around town in 3rd and it will go from 30km/h to 100 in that gear. It'll top out around 140, but thats enough to lose your license anyways.
An IL4 is all about top end power and requires a different riding style. The power delivery only comes in at the top 1/3rd of the rev range and so you need to ensure that your gear selection keeps it "on the boil". Lots of gear changes. For a learner this can be a bit tricky, as many of them don't like to rev a bike too hard, but that's what the thing was designed for, so gang away. The other thing here is that when under hard acceleration, you'll start off with a good bit of power, then after the revs have built, you get a rush of power up to the redline. The Hornet will go north of 160, which is good pose value.
As most of my riding was going to be commuting with the occasional weekend fang, I opted for the VTR, but on the fangs, it can keep a good pace on all day and is a sublime cornerer. Lots of peg scraping to be had on the loop.
Figure out what kind of riding you want to do and go for it.
"Atomic batteries to power...turbines to speed..."
- Page 14 of the Buell Owners Manual
Bookmarks