Like the one in here http://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/sh...chanical+porn?
This one is:
A fully loaded 747 at maximum thrust at cruising speed uses approximately 240 MW of power (270 kN thrust per engine at 250 m/s (913 km/h) times four engines = 240 MW)
This is 240 000 kW, or ~320 000 hp. The actual number will be less than this due to the engine not being at full thrust when cruising. But the power numbers are about right, as a comparison, a GE LM6000 aero-derivative turbine makes ~ 50 MW in a simple cycle application (these are the ones in use at Southdown power station in AKL) - and they're based on old 747 engines (GE CF-6)
320 000 hp is a lot more than the 5000 to 7000 hp a top fuel engine makes.
And it's burning nowt but glorified kerosene to do so, rather than nitro-methane.
Cheers,
FM
I crewed for a mate, Grant Longley, (Wildbunch) 55 chev running 460BB with LittleField 10/71 supercharger the engine block, like you said had concrete in the water galleries, so no water cooling at all, use to tow the car back after every run, there was a release valve on the front of the blower which had to be pressed to release the air pressure inside the blower, which was covered in ice.
Why would you ride that long and that gnarly stuff if you don't have to, Its what we do, we love it.
Nathan Woods R.I.P.
Thanks for the explanations. I always wondered.
Cheers,
Bumblebeeman1150
Brisbane, Australia
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks