Yeah, but most places dropped to 80 lately have been areas with high traffic volumes &/or lots of intersections & driveways. The Waioeka gorge certainly doesn't fit under those criteria.
If Joe Noddy & co are falling off the road trying to do 70km/h round a corner marked as a 35 in the gorge an 80km/h limit ain't gunna save them.
Cheers
Clint
The people who are crashing are probably not obaying the speed limit anyway.
It's not the straights which you usually crash anyway, only the corners, so maybe they should put some recomended speed signs up?
Two Stroke, the pinnacle of engine design
Sounds like the local councillors are on to it!
http://www.gisborneherald.co.nz/arti...iid=409&sud=27
edit; It's the farkin Jaffas!
the place is so isolated im sure the coppers will put it on low priorty to police.
A universal dream of greatness is that
We push ourselves to the limit
Yet still be brilliant when the chips are down.
Sometimes , The struggle kills the dream.
Beautiful stretch of road. Shame the gorge section is less than 30km on the run - then the rest is boring through lowlands all the way to gizzy.
Remember doing that road at new years, at 9am, sun, clear sky with the odd clouds around the hills, and a stretch of road so damn good I wish I lived in opotiki.
The Waioeka Gorge is an absolute forest of recommended speed signs of all shapes & sizes on virtually all the corners. The only thing another sign with an actual limit on it would achieve is to make revenue gathering more lucrative on the few short straights that are the motorist's only opportunity to avoid following a smoky logging truck for 50km.
Cheers
Clint
I agree with Hemi, I have been through there countless times (in car) and the "dawdlers" are the ones that cause problems, should the police not take this into consideration and put SOME focus on "dawdlers" and not just the speeders....oh wait sorry, silly me, we are talking about the police here.
"they needed to set a limit that catered to a range of drivers, depending on their experience and how well they knew the road"
WTF......Yeah let's set the rules for the lowest common denominator YET AGAIN!
Surely if they can increase the number of passing lanes and slow vehicle bays ...problem solved...or that too simple????
No body move... I dropped my brain
It's cheaper to slap up some 80km/h signs than add some passing lanes.
Perhaps some of the dozy twonks should start reading stuff like this
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/speedlimits.html
I like the "unrealistically slow" comment about advisory signs - aint that the truth! I think they are all set by what a 1954 Austin A40 can comfortably lurch around ......Speed limits do little to modify the speed of traffic, and should never be used to attempt to modify the speed of traffic. The idea of lowering a speed limit and enforcing it by camera which is so common these days is a case of falling into the "speed limit trap". It's a dangerous mistake because it shifts vital responsibility away from drivers. (click here)
“- He felt that his whole life was some kind of dream and he sometimes wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it.”
As long as they're consistent. That quote from whoever the boss of such-and-such was good -- they need to be set for such a wide variety of vehicles, all you can use them as like a `score' -- the lower the score, the slower you have to go. As long as score 25 corners are consistently marked 25 it's not a problem. You get into trouble when a 50 corner turns out to be actually a 25 corner.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks