They're cheap law enforcement.Originally Posted by celticno6
They're cheap law enforcement.Originally Posted by celticno6
Look, it's an itsy bitsy Bandit.
Good for you.Originally Posted by Yokai
What time was that? (Although I work on Ponsonby Rd, it wasn't me, by the way - my bike's red, and I wasn't riding it yesterday anyway). But I know what you mean - I used to regularly get passed on the Harbour Bridge by some eedjit on one of those "brightly coloured crotch rockets" doing at least 30 km/h faster than everyone else as he lane-split his way to work. Or eternity...Originally Posted by Yokai
Crikey. You almost sound like one of those LTSA billboards. But you're quite right.Originally Posted by Yokai
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
The problem is not the cameras per se, it is the focus on speed as a problem, and the subsequent belief that police do not need to patrol those areas where there are cameras, or anywhere for that matter. Nicer to see an "anywhere, anytime" approach here, better than fixed cameras, more of a pain for anyone who wants to do 111kmh on a straight though.
Oh and Bob, I have noticed that as people get more used to the cameras, they stop slowing down so much - most traffic round Akl sits at about 55-60kmh past a speed camera ie just below getting caught...
Queiro voya todo Europa con mi moto.... pero no tengo suficiente tiempo o dinero.....
I followed an unmarked cop car a couple of weeks ago that was driving pretty erratically. Pulled up at the lights next to him and the bastard was sending text messages on his phone!![]()
Originally Posted by MrMelon
(Message too short, angry, and full of obscenities)
And you didn't pull him over (citizen's arrest?)?Originally Posted by MrMelon
You could have at least tootled melodiously, then wagged you finger at him and shaken your head.![]()
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
So did you tap on the window and ask him WTF he was doing?
So why is itthat most times - but sadly (?) not all - when I see someone driving a bit weirdly, they're talking on their cellphone? And yet "The Powers That Be" (Feckin Eedjits That Shouldn't Be. more like) have decreed that there is insufficient evidence that cellphones are a traffic hazard to ban their use while driving? Saw an example just this morning - some twat parked acorss two lanes to turn left, and I was wondering why, till I saw he was driving one-handed and a cellphone stuck in the side of his head. AND he wasn't wearing a tinfoil hat, so the poor bastid was obiously suffering from Irradiated Brain Syndrome.
![]()
![]()
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
Hell, just read this posting, sounds like a air discription of some of our KB Bro's.Originally Posted by firestormer
Have a look at some of the other threads and there will be some one putting their hand up to any one or more of thse things
![]()
Ahem. You should read some of firestormer's trip to work stories.Originally Posted by Mongoose
I myself am of course perfect and never do anything wrong.
Angelic wee critters, aint we?Originally Posted by Jim2
![]()
Oops I forgot to use smilies to point out irony again. Silly me.Originally Posted by Mongoose
Hey Bob,I know where all ya' cops are mate.
I spoke to one in Mangere today.
Nice guy to,he let me off a $190 fine for not wearing a seat belt.
my boss did that 3 weeks ago... cop went "whatever"Originally Posted by firestormer
so he *555'd him
(boss is a lawyer...scum of teh earth)
$190 FOR NOT WEARING A SEATBELT? must be Auckland prices, down here they only charge $150Originally Posted by Jackrat
![]()
Winding up drongos, foil hat wearers and over sensitive KBers for over 14,000 posts...........![]()
" Life is not a rehearsal, it's as happy or miserable as you want to make it"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks