Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: 07 r1 review

  1. #1
    Join Date
    8th December 2006 - 15:11
    Bike
    2005 Yamaha R1
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    33

    07 r1 review

    I tried out the 07 R1 on the weekend, albeit a short test ride. I have to say it fell short of my expectations, and I found my 05 bike more responsive to throttle, quicker steering and better braking. I am wondering if Yamaha have tamed the 07 too much. Anyone else had a similar experience?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    20th April 2003 - 08:28
    Bike
    Something red and quick
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,499

    06 r1

    The 06 was. I tried it and it felt like an armchair: soft-sprung, upright position, wide fairing, narrow seat.

    My regular bike was an SP1 RC51 at that time.
    Elite Fight Club - Proudly promoting common sense and safe riding since 2024
    http://1199s.wordpress.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    23rd April 2004 - 19:16
    Bike
    2010 DC Skate Shoes
    Location
    Roxby Downs, SA
    Posts
    7,089
    I've heard they need to be geared down (3+ teeth) at the back to make the engine more usable. Yamaha's main market is the US, and they have to make the bikes nice for n00b americans to ride. It's been doing good in Superbikes so must be good with a few mods.
    KiwiBitcher
    where opinion holds more weight than fact.

    It's better to not pass and know that you could have than to pass and find out that you can't. Wait for the straight.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    22nd June 2006 - 19:35
    Bike
    N/A
    Location
    Napier
    Posts
    1,826
    Must admit that i havent ridden one yet but the price puts me off a bit. I go on to the R1- forum and the yanks are haveing a few troubles with theres regarding the lag they get when powering on. Im been quite happy to tweak my 05 up a bit and im more than happy.
    Tis a Yamahahahaha G. Just thrash it like you stole it. Gixxer 4 ever
    It really did look very unloved. Specially as it was next to the R1 that the whole crowd wanted to look at. Gixxer 4 ever

  5. #5
    Join Date
    8th December 2006 - 15:11
    Bike
    2005 Yamaha R1
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    33
    Quote Originally Posted by robertydog View Post
    Must admit that i havent ridden one yet but the price puts me off a bit. I go on to the R1- forum and the yanks are haveing a few troubles with theres regarding the lag they get when powering on. Im been quite happy to tweak my 05 up a bit and im more than happy.
    Yes I found that lag quite a put off, like a turbo charger but the power just never arrived. Seems like a power commander is a must for this bike.
    I am with you, I'll hang on to my 05 for a bit longer with a few mods and play with the colour scheme.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    22nd October 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Coromandel Town
    Posts
    4,417
    Quote Originally Posted by redr1 View Post
    I tried out the 07 R1 on the weekend, albeit a short test ride. I have to say it fell short of my expectations, and I found my 05 bike more responsive to throttle, quicker steering and better braking. I am wondering if Yamaha have tamed the 07 too much. Anyone else had a similar experience?
    Interesting comment. I was reading a UK magazine comparative test last night and their conclusion (if I remember the year correctly) was that an 03 model would leave the later ones for dead.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    30th June 2005 - 21:33
    Bike
    Yamaha 1989 TDR250, KTM 950
    Location
    Lower Hutt
    Posts
    449
    I have a few friends in the US that have busa's and blades as thier first bike. Maybe the taming is to stop the yanks from killing themselves?
    Or to tell everyone you can have a 1000cc monster with two years riding experiance?
    The real mystery is how come that fat bastard Hurley has never lost any weight.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    4th December 2006 - 13:45
    Bike
    2008 KTM SuperDuke R
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    1,010
    I took one for a test ride a couple of weeks back. Apart from it having very little range on reserve there were a few things I didn't like about it. The clutch cable-operated, so was quite heavy and the lever's lack of adjustment ment my left hand was aching after ten minutes or so. The engine was schizophrenic. Absolutely sod-all below 7,000 rpm, and a monster above it. The handling was great and the riding position comfortable and the brakes were just awesome. Oh - and the mirrors were bloody useless.

    Killer for me was the engine. I need a bike of every-day use, not just something for the track. Below 7,000 it felt like an anaemic 400, not a litre superbike.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    30th March 2004 - 11:00
    Bike
    2001 RC46
    Location
    Norfshaw
    Posts
    10,455
    Blog Entries
    17
    Doesn't the '07 R1 have that new-fangled variable intake tract thingo (technical term)? Mebbe that's what cause the "snooze below 7k RPM" behaviour...
    ... and that's what I think.

    Or summat.


    Or maybe not...

    Dunno really....


  10. #10
    Join Date
    17th May 2007 - 14:41
    Bike
    L0 GSXR-R 1000 #87
    Location
    Taranaki
    Posts
    2,524
    Quote Originally Posted by Marmoot View Post
    The 06 was. I tried it and it felt like an armchair: soft-sprung, upright position, wide fairing, narrow seat.

    My regular bike was an SP1 RC51 at that time.
    I didn't know u rode bikes?
    Firestarter Racing on facebook http://www.facebook.com/FirestarterRacing

    Racing thanks to:

    www.fluidcoatings.co.nz
    www.motostyle.co.nz
    MAXIMA racing Oils
    www.projectdigital.co.nz
    METZELER Tires
    New Plymouth Motorcycle Center
    www.topstitch.co.nz/

  11. #11
    Join Date
    26th April 2007 - 16:57
    Bike
    2002 KTM 640 SM
    Location
    Tauranga
    Posts
    217
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackbird View Post
    Interesting comment. I was reading a UK magazine comparative test last night and their conclusion (if I remember the year correctly) was that an 03 model would leave the later ones for dead.
    Could the dreaded peak of performance bikes be coming?
    I never would have though it possible so soon but with tougher
    emission and speed legislation restrictions slowly coming in the companies may be finally changing their outlooks.
    Harder to justify faster road bikes now really, maybe the 130hp 270hp bikes
    of the future are not around the corner?
    Nah probably be just a slight dip in progress though

    Cheers

  12. #12
    Join Date
    22nd October 2002 - 11:00
    Bike
    Sold
    Location
    Coromandel Town
    Posts
    4,417
    Quote Originally Posted by bimotabob View Post
    Could the dreaded peak of performance bikes be coming?

    Cheers
    Probably not. The 07 R1 is more orientated to track work and high revs than the earlier models which had greater flexibility for everyday road riding. I've extracted this piece from the 4 page article (minus dyno graph) which puts it in context.

    Charting nine years of supposed progress

    Look at the dyno graphs on the left and tell me which bike suits your riding best. The early model? Me too. From idle right through to 8000rpm, the old bike makes significantly more power and torque than the new one. And that's just on full throttle. Which most of us very rarely use on the road. Have a look at the graphs for part throttle (which is far more appropriate for road riding) and the differences are even more striking.
    This isn't how it's supposed to be. The 2007 R1 swaps five valves for four, has Yamaha's midrange-enhancing EXUP valve and variable length air intakes that supposedly give decent bottom-end and midrange power at one setting, with plenty of top-end at the other.

    But the old bike has two big advantages. Firstly, the dimensions. The old fella gets to 998cc from a relatively small bore and long stroke (74x58mm), where the new bike has a wider bore and shorter stroke (77x53.6mm). Long stroke engines make more torque and power at lower revs but can't rev as high as short stroke engines, which usually make more power, but need much higher revs to do it. And this allows the second advantage. Because the old bike only revs to 11,750rpm, it can be short-geared to get there quicker. The new bike, which needs to rev 2500rpm higher than the old one, has taller ratios to let it get there, which means it takes slightly longer to get to 9000rpm. By this point the bloke on the old geezer has changed up and buggered off.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    30th June 2005 - 21:33
    Bike
    Yamaha 1989 TDR250, KTM 950
    Location
    Lower Hutt
    Posts
    449
    Quote Originally Posted by bimotabob View Post
    Could the dreaded peak of performance bikes be coming?
    I never would have though it possible so soon but with tougher
    emission and speed legislation restrictions slowly coming in the companies may be finally changing their outlooks.
    Harder to justify faster road bikes now really, maybe the 130hp 270hp bikes
    of the future are not around the corner?
    Nah probably be just a slight dip in progress though

    Cheers
    Anyone else remember when people said this about the GSXR1100's of old?!
    140hp, 3000kgs and a three metre wheelbase?
    The real mystery is how come that fat bastard Hurley has never lost any weight.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •