Get good night vision gear, only ride at night at crazy speeds overtaking everything with your lights off. Chances of getting a ticket would be alot lower, but then the chances of an accident would be much greater.
GPS's can give false readings like that when they lose the signal then get it back and assume that you were still at the last recorded point suddenly your somewhere else and it thinks you were fair moving to get there that quick. I once had a max speed of 915kmh and I was on foot.
I never exceed the speed of light (unless im tunnelling)
...and I don't wanna die, just want to ride my motorcy...cle (Arlo Guthrie)
Ditto. I nail it past cars and get back onto my own side of the road as quickly as possible. THEN I get back down to the speed limit.
This is another thing that makes bike fun because we can pass in smaller gaps than cars can, purely because we've got the acceleration.
Oh yeah, as for your bike recording top speeds, I wouldn't worry about clearing it because you could've done that on the track.
Not if Mr Blinder is riding with you.
TOP QUOTE: “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”
In the Good Old Days, such sensible/practical behaviour was viewed appropriately, and duly ignored. Not so in these Blighted By Safety Nazism Days, where my first ticket in over 30 years was for just such an 'offense'. After following a dirty, stinking 4WD Behemoth for what seemed like an eternity, I efficiently overtook it in the first passing lane I came to, then promptly slowed down again. Mr Plod was eagerly awaiting such murderous behaviour (well, actually, he was hiding in a shrubbery at the side of the road, hoping someone would go a bit fast down the hill in the other direction), and pursued me for several kilometres in busy traffic, before he awarded me a $300 prize and 40 bonus points.
Oh yeah - that was 132km/h, and I killed at least 17.34 people during the few nanoseconds I was travelling at such sub-warp velocities.
... and that's what I think.
Or summat.
Or maybe not...
Dunno really....![]()
It is sad that we have the ability to overtake in a manner that is much safer than 100km ,with oncoming traffic, and get pinged for it. Sadly, mr Blinder and mr Bel may have to start riding pillon with you, and their mate Mr Screamer!![]()
This sort of crap drives me nuts and is totally unnecessary. Once again our personal safety is less important than sticking to the speed limit.
Argue if you will everyone, but it is not safe following something that makes you unable to breathe or flicks debris at you, even if that vehicle is doing the speed limit, or close to it.
Say the aforementioned vehicle is doing 90-95kph, we'd have to speed to pass it or risk spending around 12 seconds on the wrong side of the road if we stuck to 100kph. It's not safe to continue riding behind it so this gives us three options: pass it and risk being caught speeding, stay behind it and suffocate or be hit by flying debris, or drop back.
The safety experts would probably say pull over and let it go. This is fine and dandy except we'd catch up to it again and it's back to square one. Plus, who wants to spend their trip stopping and starting like that?
Same.... conditions are ok and safely executed..... what's the problem. I have been seen a few times with no Constabulary infringements, once passed back to the speed limit.
I do wonder though if passing a line of cars 4-5 in a row, cop see's you on the incoming traffic, has he really got a shit show in turning around and catching up with you........ would you run?
DUCATI ------- A real bike in a sea of shit!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks