This may be a problem..whaddya reckon?

[manuboy]

Was just looking thru trademe for GPS stuff, came across this auction:

http://www.trademe.co.nz/structure/0...n-17085366.htm

Did a quick search to get some reviews and the first link was this:

http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=cac...isionary&hl=en

I dunno if the products sold are identical, but if so, motorcyclists purchasing them could be at risk. Whaddya reckon? I would have emailed the seller straight away to ask, but that isn't possible ...

p.s for those too lazy to link, the auction is for stick on visor inserts, that appear to have been "responsible" for crashes in the UK (owing to the fact they cut out 94% of ambient light!). They aren't illegal tho...

[Cajun]

Was just looking thru trademe for GPS stuff, came across this auction:

http://www.trademe.co.nz/structure/0...n-17085366.htm

Did a quick search to get some reviews and the first link was this:

http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=cac...isionary&hl=en

I dunno if the products sold are identical, but if so, motorcyclists purchasing them could be at risk. Whaddya reckon? I would have emailed the seller straight away to ask, but that isn't possible ...

p.s for those too lazy to link, the auction is for stick on visor inserts, that appear to have been "responsible" for crashes in the UK (owing to the fact they cut out 94% of ambient light!). They aren't illegal tho...

VERY INTERESTING indead

[Paul in NZ]

The UK have been banging on about ALL tinted visors for yonks.

I wear perscrition glasses and I reckon in our sunlight conditions a tinted visor is brilliant! Sure, if you wore one at midnight in a coalmine while riding a 1908 Spagthorpe Weezehound equipped with acetlyne lamps with tarnished reflectors and badly trimmed wicks you might have issues but it come down to common sense.

These things you describe are not tinted visors but some sort of stick on thing. Probably not dissimilar to a fog city insert or summat. I presume they will work fine as long as you use some common sense. (there is that word again)

Of course what will happen is some dipshit will fall of their turgid pile of overpowered crap that they have not taken the time to learn properly and blame the visor while holding a hand out for compo and screwing it for the rest of us.

I say, let's not let this happen to our beloved tinted visors. Let's kill these people NOW while we have the chance and what's more! I have a LIST!!!! (ok - going nowhere with this now)

Abandon thread......

Paul N

[manuboy]

I'm a bit of a fan of common sense myself Paul.... and i've got no idea of the history of British attitude to tinted visors (you didn't mention who in the UK had the issues????) nor have i a problem with the concept - i wanna buy some, but they remove 94% of ambient light (the brand in question).

Not being an egghead, i asked my photographer mate beside me, and ambient light seems to be right up there in the requirements for vision stakes... so it would seem that if that is true, wearing them would equate to "midnight in a coalmine while riding a 1908 Spagthorpe Weezehound equipped with acetlyne lamps with tarnished reflectors and badly trimmed wicks"...

Quote from the link

The insert in question cut light transmission to eight percent with many other visors in the range offered by the two companies reducing light to only four percent

Ya reckon that's just some UK copper having an unjustified rave about the products? Again, i have no problem with tinted visors, i want to buy some, i was just concerne that some internet capatilist(?) was flogging crap they can't sell for legal reasons in other countries, and riders here would reap the benefits... and now i have to die....

[Midnight 82]

I prefer to wear my shades you can take them off alot easier when you need tooooooooo

[Angry Puppy]

$60 for 2? Fuck off! I paid like, $10 for a pair.

In the UK (if I remember rightly) inserts are legal up to a 40% tint, which the Motrax are. 40% aint that mutch. Besides, if you do have to ride in the dark, stop and take the insert out. You can always put it back in later.

The only downer is that you have to cut notches out of them so that they'll bend around the inside of your visor enough for you to be able to close the thing!

Cheaper than a second, tinted visor (but not at those stupid prices). I use them and would recomend them.

FB

[StoneChucker]

if you can get visors, tinted or not, that block UV light? I find after a days ride, I'm rather burnt. And yes, sunscreen is the obvious answer, but it is oily and wouldn't go well with the inside lining of my helmet.

I think the best solution is a completely sealed helmet, with a wrap-around lcd panel inside, which relays camera feed from all directions of the bike

[What?]

$60 for 2? Fuck off! I paid like, $10 for a pair.

Ain't it fun, tripping around Trademe looking for stuff where the bids have gone way past normal retail prices....

[What?]

Ya reckon that's just some UK copper having an unjustified rave about the products?

Absolutley a wank from someone. 4% light transmission is firmly in the realm of arc welding visors, not crash helmet visors.

[bluninja]

if you can get visors, tinted or not, that block UV light? I find after a days ride, I'm rather burnt. And yes, sunscreen is the obvious answer, but it is oily and wouldn't go well with the inside lining of my helmet.

I think the best solution is a completely sealed helmet, with a wrap-around lcd panel inside, which relays camera feed from all directions of the bike

Found this link....so I guess the answer is that there are UV products around.

http://www.webbikeworld.com/r2/polar...lar-optics.htm

Careful with the sun block if it comnines with sewat and runs in your eye that can blind you as badly as a black visor down a coal mine