Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: New 08 Hayabusa just released

  1. #1
    Join Date
    6th January 2007 - 16:52
    Bike
    Other peoples weapons....
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,708

    New 08 Hayabusa just released

    F@rk!! What a weapon!!!!

    How do I hide that in the sidecar??
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2008busa1.jpg 
Views:	133 
Size:	15.8 KB 
ID:	76433  
    Is it still beastiality if ya fuck a frozen chicken??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th July 2007 - 11:33
    Bike
    2018 Honda NC750X
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    293
    argh hate to get a bird fly into the front of it LOL

  3. #3
    Join Date
    18th July 2007 - 18:16
    Bike
    A naked monster - just like me.
    Location
    Just outside your window
    Posts
    1,923
    I could be wrong, but there is a possibility that this pic has been photoshopped. By a 5 year old. On Crack.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    6th January 2007 - 16:52
    Bike
    Other peoples weapons....
    Location
    Taupo
    Posts
    4,708
    Buggar!!! I guess I'll have to ring up the nice man that talked me into putting a deposit on one!! Now, where did I put his Nigerian phone number?? :slap:
    Is it still beastiality if ya fuck a frozen chicken??

  5. #5
    Join Date
    18th July 2007 - 18:16
    Bike
    A naked monster - just like me.
    Location
    Just outside your window
    Posts
    1,923
    Quote Originally Posted by scrivy View Post
    Buggar!!! I guess I'll have to ring up the nice man that talked me into putting a deposit on one!! Now, where did I put his Nigerian phone number?? :slap:
    0900 CASH4TANK

  6. #6
    Join Date
    28th August 2003 - 23:04
    Bike
    Hyosung GTR250
    Location
    in a house with walls
    Posts
    194
    Thats just UGLY ..... may have only been 3year old although im sure some 3year olds can do better....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    3rd October 2004 - 17:35
    Posts
    6,390
    woah dude look at the ram air intake on that!
    Then I could get a Kb Tshirt, move to Timaru and become a full time crossdressing faggot

  8. #8
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    Quote Originally Posted by renegade master View Post
    woah dude look at the ram air intake on that!
    I seriously hope it isn't a ramjet:

    Quote Originally Posted by Wikipedia
    Ramjets have been run from as low as 45 m/s (100 mph)[1] upwards. Below about Mach 0.5 they give little thrust and are highly inefficient due to their low pressure ratios.

    Above this speed, given sufficient initial flight velocity, a ramjet will be self-sustaining. Indeed, unless the vehicle drag is extremely high, the engine/airframe combination will tend to accelerate to higher and higher flight speeds, substantially increasing the air intake temperature. As this could have a detrimental effect on the integrity of the engine and/or airframe, the fuel control system must reduce engine fuel flow to stabilize the flight Mach number and, thereby, air intake temperature to sensible levels.

    Due to the stoichiometric combustion temperature, efficiency is usually good at high speeds (Mach 2-3), whereas at low speeds the relatively poor compression ratio means that ramjets are outperformed by turbojets or even rockets.
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  9. #9
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    WTF does wiki know about ramjets?

    At high supersonic speed, everyone knows that the Scramjet is the preferred motive force, as the combustion air does not need to be slowed to sub-sonic speeds before ignition.

    Afterburning of turbojet engines is still the most realistic and convenient way of sustaining low (1-3 mach) supersonic speeds, plus the ability to have a single type of engine/s for all phases of flight.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    My point was that you'd have to get it up to ~160 km/h before the engine would work. Would hate to have to push start the bike.

    Besides I don't think EVERYONE knows what a scramjet is. But you're right for hypersonic speeds the scramjet is a better approach than the ramjet. Albeit, you'll get into trouble eventually and would then prefer a rocket.
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  11. #11
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 18:04
    Bike
    Big, black and slow
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,997
    The official launch is at Holeshot on Barry's Point Road tonight... so I heard. It's probably there now...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    The problem with a rocket is that they are severely limited by their fuel use/carriage ability. That and they have a tendency to go BANG at inopportune times.....

    The scramjet is extradinarily economical and reliable by comparison, and is still good for speeds of M10.0 (that's roughly 100 miles a minute or 1 mile/3.6 seconds....!)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    Quote Originally Posted by marty View Post
    The problem with a rocket is that they are severely limited by their fuel use/carriage ability. That and they have a tendency to go BANG at inopportune times.....

    The scramjet is extradinarily economical and reliable by comparison, and is still good for speeds of M10.0 (that's roughly 100 miles a minute or 1 mile/3.6 seconds....!)
    Yeah, it is impressive. Still, they haven't found any commercial applications yet I believe. And the weapon industry's money is still on rockets for most long distance delivery systems - cruise missiles being a notable exception with a few of them utilising ramjets.

    The stratospheric "bounce" passengerliner contemplated by boeing (I believe) is also still a fair way out in the future...
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •