Another MLC....

[Joni]

Maybe it's b/c when women admire a tight butt or generousity in certain areas of the male anatomy we do it with subtlety (please note I can only speak from my own personal experineces here), unlike our male counterparts who oogle accompanied by gawping, whooping and hollering or drooling.

Yeah the drool can get a little umm uncomfortable as it slips down the cleavage....

[HanaBelle]

Maybe it's b/c when women admire a tight butt or generousity in certain areas of the male anatomy we do it with subtlety (please note I can only speak from my own personal experineces here), unlike our male counterparts who oogle accompanied by gawping, whooping and hollering or drooling.

A *subtle* crotch watch...now theres a concept.

HB
who has never looked a crotch that wasnt naked already and cant imagine why you would bother, but has been known to drool at butts in blue jeans (but only with white shirt and boots too)...

[Paul in NZ]

Maybe it's b/c when women admire a tight butt or generousity in certain areas of the male anatomy we do it with subtlety (please note I can only speak from my own personal experineces here), unlike our male counterparts who oogle accompanied by gawping, whooping and hollering or drooling.

Spoken like someone that has never been to a English Mid Lands 'Hens' evening...

It was horrible, all the graspin' and grabbin'

Paul N

[Ms Piggy]

Yeah the drool can get a little umm uncomfortable as it slips down the cleavage....

[Ms Piggy]

Spoken like someone that has never been to a English Mid Lands 'Hens' evening...

It was horrible, all the graspin' and grabbin'

Paul N

No Paul - I've never had the pleasure.

[Ms Piggy]

who has never looked a crotch that wasnt naked already and cant imagine why you would bother, but has been known to drool at butts in blue jeans (but only with white shirt and boots too)...

Yeah well this is true, it's the packaging.

[geoffm]

Im not exactly a younin either... but I got boobies, and boobies always have a market somewhere....

/homer
"Hmmm, booobies..."
/homer
Geoff :-)

[Paul in NZ]

Now I was not lookin' at her boobies....

[Joni]

Now I was not lookin' at her boobies....

Yeah thats because they pretty hard to spot...

sorry!!... do you know her?

[Blakamin]

Now I was not lookin' at her boobies....

me thinks she might be new to two wheels

[kerryg]

Spoken like someone that has never been to a English Mid Lands 'Hens' evening...

It was horrible, all the graspin' and grabbin'

Paul N

That of course goes completely against nature, which is why it is so hideous a spectacle. Women, being the gender biologically equipped to bear and suckle our children (who remain dependent for longer than any other species ...the children I mean) are hard-wired for monogamy . It's because they can hardly go out and hunt mastodons and sabre tooth tigers when they're heavily pregnant as well as breastfeeding, so they need to latch onto a good mastodon hunter and stick it to...no, I mean, stick by him (sorry, Freudian slip). ON THE OTHER HAND, good hunters are good..sorry..I mean hard (oops, sorry again...good..damn now I'm getting confused...you know what I mean) to find and so, law of supply and demand, are popular with the ladies. And, as Mr Darwin told us, a dominant male will more successful in producing large numbers of offspring than a male who is less successful in distributing his genetic material..and so is the species improved. Which it is only natural, and also highly desirable for the good of all mankind, that men should keep a weather eye out for good opportunities to mate as often as they can with partners of the most genetically suitable stock (e.g. big hooters=good feeding capability). THEREFORE (there is a point to this) it is NOT NATURAL and therefore UTTERLY REPUGNANT to all men, as well as being against the natural order of the universe that women should ogle men in a sexually inappropriate way, while it IS NATURAL and in fact HIGHLY DESIRABLE that men should closely examine a wide range of fertile womens' women's physical shapes (especially their hooters...oh..did I mention that already??) in terms of their suitability for tupping .. ..should really say as potential receptacles of their precious genetic material.

It is ordained by biology..we can't help it.

[Joni]

That of course goes completely against nature, which is why it is so hideous a spectacle. Women, being the gender biologically equipped to bear and suckle our children (who remain dependent for longer than any other species ...the children I mean) are hard-wired for monogamy . It's because they can hardly go out and hunt mastodons and sabre tooth tigers when they're heavily pregnant as well as breastfeeding, so they need to latch onto a good mastodon hunter and stick it to...no, I mean, stick by him (sorry, Freudian slip). ON THE OTHER HAND, good hunters are good..sorry..I mean hard (oops, sorry again...good..damn now I'm getting confused...you know what I mean) to find and so, law of supply and demand, are popular with the ladies. And, as Mr Darwin told us, a dominant male will more successful in producing large numbers of offspring than a male who is less successful in distributing his genetic material..and so is the species improved. Which it is only natural, and also highly desirable for the good of all mankind, that men should keep a weather eye out for good opportunities to mate as often as they can with partners of the most genetically suitable stock (e.g. big hooters=good feeding capability). THEREFORE (there is a point to this) it is NOT NATURAL and therefore UTTERLY REPUGNANT to all men, as well as being against the natural order of the universe that women should ogle men in a sexually inappropriate way, while it IS NATURAL and in fact HIGHLY DESIRABLE that men should closely examine a wide range of fertile womens' women's physical shapes (especially their hooters...oh..did I mention that already??) in terms of their suitability for tupping .. ..should really say as potential receptacles of their precious genetic material.

It is ordained by biology..we can't help it.

Well thank you Kerryg, now that I have seen it evaluated from a scientific perspective it all seems so much easier to deal with men who forget the location of my face and presume its located on my chest when they speak to me...

[Ms Piggy]

Well thank you Kerryg, now that I have seen it evaluated from a scientific perspective it all seems so much easier to deal with men who forget the location of my face and presume its located on my chest when they speak to me...

That reminds me of a funny story Joni - my sister (being a well endowed women - no I'm not giving out her phone number to you Kerryg!) was in an appliance store one day. She was speaking to one of the staff about getting a new t.v, she notcied he seemed a little pre-occupied with her chest and was in fact directing his conversation to her breasts rather than her face. My lovely sister (being as subtle as a brick) grabs her breasts, shakes them and says, "Oi! Wake up you two he's talking to ya!".

[Joni]

That reminds me of a funny story Joni - my sister (being a well endowed women - no I'm not giving out her phone number to you Kerryg!) was in an appliance store one day. She was speaking to one of the staff about getting a new t.v, she notcied he seemed a little pre-occupied with her chest and was in fact directing his conversation to her breasts rather than her face. My lovely sister (being as subtle as a brick) grabs her breasts, shakes them and says, "Oi! Wake up you two he's talking to ya!".

Classic CSL!!! - I must meet her some time.
I generally drop my face to their eye level and say "hello Im up here..." that normally brings a little colour to the offending parties face.

[NC]

Tell me about it, they never do haha, I mean,

You'll be ok when you get your R1 back...