Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
Damn that Viagra!
Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
Damn that Viagra!
The world will look up and shout "Save Us!", and I'll whisper "no"
Newbie to bikes yes, newbie to the road or law no. Have had a nice car dynoed at 244kW @ rear wheels and haven't run anyone or myself off the road for the last 6 years that I have owned it, so I know the road and know my limits and hazards. So please don't sterotype me and put me in pigon hole.Originally Posted by Jim2
Why am I getting shot at anyway? Yes I am listening.... I thought I asked for comments, and I got some. so that is good.![]()
![]()
Posh, read again. I have tried to resolve it nice and calmly. I when there in person and reminded them about the bag that was sold and fitted by them. and then pointed out the paint damage, and anything that they would do to set me right / fair and square. They gave me a number for a paint shop and that it, refused to provide refund for the bag, refused to compensate in any part for the paint damage, refused to acknowledge that the bag had any fault in design or fit what so ever. I was nice and asked nicely, but I got given the long walk around and reason / excuse for everything, other words a long winded way of saying "no we don't care and have no responsibility although we did recommended that bag for your bike and fitted it"Originally Posted by Posh Tourer :P
[peace]
I have common sense, I walked in there with the budget to buy a good set of givi panniers. I walked out having spend less than 1/2 my budget with a seat bag, sure very happy at that time. Until I found that the product end up costing me more than what I paided for the product doubled. so yes they had a chance to sell me lots and lots of scuff proof and I was listening for the record.Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
Just want to point out that I am not trying bad mouthing at this stage, I am stating what has happend and its true. I wanted to get a balanced view point from the people, and not hopefully a coloured or clouded one as one can have when in such siturations. and yes I got my result, and got some views that will balance mine.Originally Posted by Celtic_Sea_lily
Oh and I didn't now threaten or tell the business that I'll post it on a public forum or get a mediator (which is small claims) if they didn't do so and so. I have left it to their own device as to how to handle this case, fair and square.
Oh and everyone, please really read up on what small claims courts is. It not sueing someone, its a disputes resolution method when both parties cannot resolve their differences. Where a 3rd party will look at it from a neutral prespective. NO Damages or penelties can be imposed except on the subject / object in question. NO lawyers are involved. So NO you would be footing the bill for lawyers or court fees.
Thanks StingerOriginally Posted by Stinger
People I am purely talking about it as an topic, I have not threatened anyone or company or fill in any forms or filed any proceedings. Although I reserve the rights to... I was wondering why this thread was getting out of hand, can't you grown ups with so much knowledge & wisdom keep your cool and look at it subjectivelly?ok... just go and have a beer and chill out and forget any of this has happened.
I have also LEARN from this experience, and going to get a hard top box instead. So there is no chance of rubbing the paint now is there?Originally Posted by Stinger
Mmmm........wow , looks like it got a little heated in here.
Heres my 1.98 cents worth (depreciation), please note this is an opinion only - so no name calling, Im a sensitive individual![]()
1. All of us (at some stage) rely on the opinions of those that are supposed experts in their field. When we are given that advice we have an expectation that it will be right, some times it is, and sometimes it is not![]()
2. You get what you pay for - no this is not a harsh way of saying you were cheap, so you deserved what happened, but even the most naive of us understand when some thing does not sit 100% right, or we feel that things could be different - i.e expected to spend $$$ but it only cost me $.
3. Most people seldom speak up for fear of appearing like a 'dork' for challenging the opinion of a so called expert (i know this because I am both the expert and the dork)- But common sense must prevail above all other ranting![]()
So to finish...and finally get to my point.
Take it on the chin - I dont think Motomail ever had any intention of causing any harm, the bag does what bags do, and common sense should have prevailed over the fitting of the bag by BOTH parties.
If you really want to get a definitive opinion as to who is right - sure go to the disputes court - BUT you may still never be entirely happy with the verdict anyway.
Purchase the top box with the 'correct' fitting kit for your bike (I love my GIVI one)![]()
Now get on with your life and go and Ride your bike...like you know you wanna.
Good on you for asking the opinions of others......![]()
If I were you...............then who would be me???![]()
CB125 - CB200 - CB400/4 - CB650 - XJ600 - XJ550 - GPZ900R - CBX750F2 - GSX1100F - GSX1400K2
Hmmmmmmm, sorry Zapf but I have to disagree with ya on that one. The title of your thread is "Seat bag problem.... and Motormail" and then your original post is about Motomail. I just don't think it's a good idea and personally I wouldn't post the name of a business on a public forum, you never know when that will come back and bite you in the butt.Originally Posted by Zapf
My goal in life is to be as good a person as my dog already thinks I am.
Mate,Originally Posted by Zapf
If as you say this shop actualy fitted the bag,then yes they should do the rigthie by you and fix the damage.You should of said they fitted it in the first place,that changes the whole deal,they did it,they should fix it.
I based my earlier reply on the infomation you originaly gave,it sounded like you fitted the bag yourself.
As for the top box,let's see how many times you kick the thing getting on an off![]()
Oh I just love this! Information in dribs and drabs! The most important bits last!
Now you say motomail actually fitted the bag? Since (in my experience) these things are designed to be removeable I'm going to assume you didn't touch it at all from their original fitment?
If they fitted it AND you didn't touch it afterwards then yes they have a case to answer.
If they fitted it AND you did touch it afterwards then no they don't have a case to answer.
Paul N
No, but unless it's a factory fitment and you strictly adhere to the load ratings you can damage the frame / paint by stressing parts that were never designed to bear those loads.... If you put a Givi one on they are generally pretty good.Originally Posted by Zapf
Any luggage on a bike is generally the LAST thing the designer looked at and is more often the work of the devil. Exceptions being proper tourers with integral luggage and even some of them ain't too flash!
Don't bank on any of it being waterproof either.
The lash ups, black plastic rubbish sacks and 100's of bungee cords are all a part of the fun of touring on a bike.
Paul N
What has the car got to do with it? You publicly complained about a retail motorcycle outlet and threatened legal action via legal statute. There was no hint that you'd even considered that you might have checked out proper installation procedure or negotiated with Motomail, instead you bad mouthed them in a public forum with incomplete evidence. Given that this is a "written" media, and probably archived you've done yourself no favours.Originally Posted by Zapf
Despite what you say further down, we DO pay for the SCC, and there are costs involved for the losing party. I think you are being frivolous, you haven't explained yourself well at all, and if you take ANYTHING away from this make sure it is asking how something works BEFORE you spend money on it. If you possibly can, reflect on why it is not always the "best" approach to use the CGA or SCC whenever things go wrong for you. You may have a "right" (actually a privilege) to legal recourse but is it the right thing to do?
And one of those net thingees?Originally Posted by Paul in NZ
I sorta need to know...
The world will look up and shout "Save Us!", and I'll whisper "no"
Originally Posted by Celtic_Sea_lily
I think that given that he stated what had happened (I thought he did a pretty good job), then including the name of the retailer was a good idea. Most people here didn't think motomail did anything wrong so it doesn't do their name any harm for those people. I think that knowing about these situations is a really good idea.
I have two different shopping strategies. The one where I go and buy something at the cheapest price, because I already know everything I want to know about a product..., and the one where I want advice because of the potential to waste more money by purchasing the wrong product. Both of these strategies usually result in the getting the best overall value or cost to me. It makes a really big difference to me if people employ "Sales people" who's sole job is to make more money, or "knowledgeable staff".
Should they have told him about the paint - Yes
Is it their Fault - No
I think more people should put their stories like this out on the line, and I hope that the name calling won't deter other people from doing so. That way if there are things they hadn't considered then they can be told...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks