So here is the scenario: I sold a small bike to a chap. I had a set price and told him that, as I am decent and I try to get all bikes to a standard so that I would buy them my self for the price, the price included a "back to me" warranty for any major issues he would have in a 1 - 2 months time.
He did not want to pay my price, but came up with the idea that if I sold it cheeper he would sort any issues out him self. Reluctlantly I agreed. And after he had been to my place and had a test ride he happily picked her up and paid.
Yep, you guessed it... 2 weeks later I am contacted and he has a problem. He recognises the fact that he did not pay the extra money, but asks if I would still be prepared to sort it out, as he is not up to it. After clearly explaining that this would have been covered if he had paid the extra money I agree to have a look.
The bike turns up and I have a look. First I notice is that the tank is empty...reason it does not start! But there is also another problem. I fix it and she now runs sweet. The bits I used I would have sold s/h for about $50. I spent 4 hours sorting her out.
I contact him and say: "All sorted. Cost you $80". He is not happy, recon I should have fixed for free!!
I give him the comparison about a theft insurance, where you are offered one but decide not to take it. Then when you have the item stolen you can hardly go back to the insurance company and say: "Hey, I had it stolen, I now want a replacement as you offered the insurance, but I refused..."
He has not been back to pick her up yet, but I am wondering what the outcome will be?
As it was a private sale there is no Consumers Guarantee Act etc. that covers it. Just me being a decent sort of guy.
Comments?
Bookmarks