Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 132

Thread: Interesting fact about a wheel.

  1. #31
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    I would say if you had another identical wheel rotating at the same rpm in the opposite direction then the momentum of the top and bottom halves would be the equal.


    Are we talking about momentum or angular momentum?

    Bottom halves, top halves, that's the part that doesn't make sense. It's a wheel for christ's sake... Not two hemi wheels or something else, it's a wheel and should be treated as such.

    Unless of course you're not interested in the mechanics behind the motion...
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  2. #32
    Join Date
    13th December 2004 - 10:05
    Bike
    SV400
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel View Post


    Are we talking about momentum or angular momentum?

    Bottom halves, top halves, that's the part that doesn't make sense. It's a wheel for christ's sake... Not two hemi wheels or something else, it's a wheel and should be treated as such.

    Unless of course you're not interested in the mechanics behind the motion...
    I am ignoring any vertical displacement as these are equal in this case.
    So out of any angular value your only taking the horizontal component. The same direction as the bike in negative or positive values but all positve after combined with the forward displacement.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    I am ignoring any vertical displacement as these are equal in this case.
    So out of any angular value your only taking the horizontal component. The same direction as the bike in negative or positive values but all positve after combined with the forward displacement.
    Que?

    Just tell us what you're trying to achieve and stop trying to make sense, because it doesn't work.
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  4. #34
    Join Date
    13th December 2004 - 10:05
    Bike
    SV400
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel View Post
    Que?

    Just tell us what you're trying to achieve and stop trying to make sense, because it doesn't work.
    Experiment:

    Lets set up a 17 inch wheel in a cradle that can pivot the wheel horizontally about and axis that goes through the centreline of the axle from front to back of the wheel maybe ever so slightly above center.
    Place this in a train moving at 100 kph and spin the wheel at 884 rpm. Now move the entire cradle from side to side in relation to the forward movement of the train . What happens?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    If you only move the cradle from side to side - the wheel will sit rock solid in the cradle not tilting or changing it's direction of rotation.
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  6. #36
    Join Date
    3rd November 2005 - 18:04
    Bike
    Big, black and slow
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    2,997
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    Think we should all delete this as its a bit off topic!
    Dude, your bike is off topic.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    22nd August 2003 - 22:33
    Bike
    ...
    Location
    NZ
    Posts
    4,205
    Blog Entries
    5
    so the 250-odd g's, causing substrantail centrifugal stability, would react in what fashion when i input a force to the axle 90 degrees before i want the reaction to happen?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    10th April 2005 - 09:35
    Bike
    .
    Location
    .
    Posts
    815
    Since when did KB ever start being on topic with anything??


    stop being a farkin whinger otherwise we'll shrinkwrap ya, and send ya down to Dunedin with all the rest of 'em
    It is what it is

  9. #39
    Join Date
    13th June 2006 - 09:37
    Bike
    Honda CX500 "Shithawk"
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    1,907
    Quote Originally Posted by Patch View Post
    ...send ya down to Dunedin with all the rest of 'em
    Eh wot?? Bastidge!
    Determined to kill my bike before it kills me

  10. #40
    Join Date
    13th June 2006 - 09:37
    Bike
    Honda CX500 "Shithawk"
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    1,907
    EDIT: OOps, posted in wrong thread.

    Look, GSVR, the whole wheel has the same momentum, it just looks like the top half has more momentum when you do the calculations as you would with the ground as your frame of reference. This cannot be done.
    The calculation must be done with the axle as the frame of reference, then the thing becomes clear - the whole wheel has the momentum, not just one part of it.
    Determined to kill my bike before it kills me

  11. #41
    Join Date
    13th June 2006 - 09:37
    Bike
    Honda CX500 "Shithawk"
    Location
    Dunedin
    Posts
    1,907
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    What are you on about? Are you sure your posting in the right thread!
    OOps!
    You are right, wrong thread.
    Determined to kill my bike before it kills me

  12. #42
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    Can you delete all of it then as otherwise this will end up in senseless drivel
    Why bother with deleting it. I doubt anyone is going to find this thread "prune"-worthy.

    Either it dies from old age or gets relocated to PD.
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

  13. #43
    Join Date
    13th December 2004 - 10:05
    Bike
    SV400
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    2,173
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel View Post
    If you only move the cradle from side to side - the wheel will sit rock solid in the cradle not tilting or changing it's direction of rotation.
    Made a drawing. The sideways movements will be reasonably forcefull over say 1 metre.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	TrainExperiment.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	70.4 KB 
ID:	86064  

  14. #44
    Join Date
    26th September 2007 - 13:52
    Bike
    Scorpio
    Location
    Tapu te Ranga
    Posts
    1,471
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    Cool you just said it. Now which instant are you talking about because every point in time is an instant in time. So you are actually saying all the time.
    Yes, all the time. But it might be worth remembering that the "top half" and "bottom half" of the wheel that we're talking about at one instant will not be the top half and bottom half a short time later. Then again it might not be worth remembering: it depends (again) on where you're going to go with this argument.

  15. #45
    Join Date
    8th October 2007 - 14:58
    Bike
    Loud and hoony
    Location
    Now
    Posts
    3,215
    Quote Originally Posted by GSVR View Post
    Made a drawing. The sideways movements will be reasonably forcefull over say 1 metre.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel View Post
    If you only move the cradle from side to side - the wheel will sit rock solid in the cradle not tilting or changing it's direction of rotation.
    There's your answer.
    It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)

    Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •