
Originally Posted by
Ixion
Y'know , there's a sort of art in old bike riding. In knowing what *needs* to be fixed, versus what *should* be fixed.
Y' sort of need to accept the old bike like y' would y' grandfather. Not everything is perfect any more. But there's a difference between the imperfact that calls for a fast trip to the emergency ward, and the imperfect that just calls forth a complaint about getting old on cold mornings.
If something's wrong that might fail and kill you, yes, you must fix that. Or if it's so gutless that it can't even get up that hill. Or if something's worn that may break and leave you stranded 500km from home, you need to look at that.
And so on. Sounds to me that maybe you are demanding a state of mechanical purity that isn't really practical.
Me, I'd keep it. But I wouldn't spend any more money on it. Or, not much. Only what *had* to be spent.
Bookmarks