110BHP 155kg and what a crazy motor!
no doubt that 110HP can be tweaked to get wayyyy more too.
http://www.motorcyclists-online.com/...u=c2FUWmV2cW90
has made a bo-bo in his nappies
110BHP 155kg and what a crazy motor!
no doubt that 110HP can be tweaked to get wayyyy more too.
http://www.motorcyclists-online.com/...u=c2FUWmV2cW90
on the wagon
thats a work of art
Kiwibiker
Put some chambers on it and get it into production fast!
Bucket Racer/Crasher
Interesting, but those are big cylinders if they are each only 125cc. They look big enough to be 500cc each. I don't think chambers are going to be a great improvement if that is the sort of 2-stroke I think it is.
needs to work harder
That is some crazy shit. Not sure I'd want to wheel it into TSS for a service - they'd be, like, uhhhh?
Nice find.
Dave
Signature needed. Apply within.
Bogeyman
Nice. Looks very “designed” as in “stylised”.
That usually means little or no engineering finesse but there’s nothing wrong with the engineering in this case, very innovative and structurally well thought out.
Not keen on the fairing/consul thing though.
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
BogOff-Cant you see I'm busy?
The Poles aren't renowed for their engineering build quality, like the Czechs are.
Looks like a lot of fun though.
Forum whore
Originally Posted by kiwifruit
thats a work of art
Sure is! Who'da thought... a radial bike engine, (though most radials are odd numbered cylinders), looks scary!
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Homo Sapiens Vulgaris
Hehe - they "builded the bike".
Guttered that it only puts out 110 hps from 500 ccm...
Looks impressive. I'm just wondering how it would handle
I don't know that much about 2-stroke engines but where's the extractor chambers on the exhausts? They kinda look too pretty for a 2-stroke...
24 l fuel tank - I guess it'll need that!
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Mallicious Little Gnome
So have you put your order in then Mike?
You started on strokers so at your fine old age you should be looking at finishing on them.
Sort of like closing the circle
"When you think of it,
Lifes a bowl of ....MERDE"
Bogeyman
Id'a thunk it.
In fact I did, everyone's always stealing my ideas.
Always thought a 180° “V” (transverse shaft boxer twin) made a lot of sense, very low cog and centralised mass.
Likewise, a 120° (incl) frameless radial triple, swingarm off the rear cyl, steering head off the front…
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
Hardcore Biker
And "The frame is made from steel tubes". Woohoo.
Forum whore
Yeah, but we need the $$$ to invest! You'll just have to find a sponser next time...Id'a thunk it.
In fact I did, everyone's always stealing my ideas.
Always thought a 180° “V” (transverse shaft boxer twin) made a lot of sense, very low cog and centralised mass.
Likewise, a 120° (incl) frameless radial triple, swingarm off the rear cyl, steering head off the front…
The transverse shaft idea would cause a few issues about engine placement in the frame, though, wouldn't it?
You don't get to be an old dog without learning a few tricks.
Shorai Powersports batteries are very trick!
Little ol'Hornet Rides again!
Go the two strokes!Nice find there!
"I like to ride anyplace, anywhere, any time, any way!"
Bogeyman
Yeah, above a certain capacity the overall length would be an issue.
One way of developing structural designs is a force vector diagram, if you quantify all the loads and the angles at which they apply to the system you can come very close to defining the structure itself. The major loads on a bike are at the swingarm pivot and the steering head, for a road bike there’s comparatively minor loads involving the rider at the seat and pegs.
If you consider the relative positions of the two major loads you can see how arranging cylinders at about 120° allows you to use the heads as structural entities with the minor loads requiring only lightweight sub-frames. A 120° V twin ain’t optimum from an engine design standpoint but a triple radial might be, given that most current twin developments are at 60° odd. Some reservations about rod arrangement and breathing…
Go soothingly on the grease mud, as there lurks the skid demon
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks