I looked the bike over pretty carefully before buying. Given that it's a naked, I would have expected to see scratches on the frame and engine if it had been down the road - I couldn't spot any of the normal tell-tales.
I'm the fourth owner. The previous owner had only had it for three weeks before me. He bought it from a dealer, the dealer had it as part of a trade-in from the original owner, who had owned it for a couple of years, and who had been scrupulous about servicing etc (all servicing done by the dealer).
I phoned the dealer pre-purchase and they didn't say anything that gave me cause for alarm - they knew the bike well and reckoned it was mint.
I noticed the pitting after picking it up off the side of the road. My first thought was 'bad casting'. Bit weird cos it looks like an OEM part.
There are a few other marks on the peg - scratches and stuff, but it's almost impossible for me to tell if they were there before it went down the road. The peg-end isn't scratched - the peg hasn't been on the deck.
Question: Is it possible to weld something like that and not leave a big welding seam, or any other trace (welding rod material)? I'm pretty sure I would have spotted a seam when I looked the bike over. I'm also pretty sure when I get the bike back and fit the peg up that the pieces will fit together more or less seamlessly, and the outer surface will look shiny and untouched (apart from the crack). My money at the moment is on bad casting.
Is there any way of finding out if it is OEM? If it is OEM, I'll want to have a word with Triumph about this.
I'll be taking the whole bike to a dealer this week and asking them to look it over with a fine-tooth comb.
Thank you to everyone for your good wishes.
Does anyone know a place I can take this to in Auckland to get a definitive answer on whether this was a weld repair or a bad casting?
It is possible to do a good weld repair which is visually close to perfect from the outside (ignoring those pits for the moment), but you'll always see a difference in the internal structure. Although I'm semi-retired, I was maintenance engineering manager many moons ago at a pulp and paper mill which included non-destructive testing. If you feel you need to get a proper analysis done, I'm sure that I can still pull some strings. Chew your options over and PM me if you'd like to follow up the offer.
Cheers,
Geoff

Dat aint right. wot evr it is/
Its been welded all right...then most of the weld ground off and polished. There are file marks in the fillet area (where the porosity is) The weld area wasnt prepared by "V"-ing it out, to get the penetration right thru to the middle, but has had little or no preperation ..... the shiny 1mm-or-so would be the sum total of the weld penetration. Cant give you any clues to the original cause of failure though I'm afraid.
That's shocking!
Very glad to hear that the break didn't cause a bin.
In your position, I'd certainly want to follow this up as a matter of principle.
kiwibiker is full of love, an disrespect.
- mikey
Crikey mate, good thing you still have your foot!
However, reading this I get a feeling that the term OEM is being used outside its definition.
Another thing - what is the probability that one die cast rearset out of perhaps 200,000 is born with a structural defect? I mean, quality control is a statistical process and now and again a sub-standard part will pass through control and go onto the market.
My point of course being that the part might not have been patched up - but had the flaw from the get-go, and eventually the flaw will result in failure.
It is preferential to refrain from the utilisation of grandiose verbiage in the circumstance that your intellectualisation can be expressed using comparatively simplistic lexicological entities. (...such as the word fuck.)
Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. - Joseph Rotblat
Geoff, thanks for your offers of help. I appreciate it a lot. I am going to chew things over for a day or two before making a decision.
However, a fistful of painkillers, a couple of beers and a nights sleep has rebooted the brain a little.
Yes, it's pretty clear now that it was snapped off, then very, very badly welded, then polished. The polish marks on the backside of the peg stand out like the balls on a bulldog ('course, I couldn't see them from the front when I was checking out the bike.....).
The bike was sold new from a dealer, then traded back to the dealer (who traded it on). The dealer has now seen fit to tell me that they think the bike was in a low speed drop. This is despite me specifically phoning them before I put my money down to get an idea of the bikes condition, etc.
I didn't specifically ask: 'has it been dropped?'. So you live and learn.
Sounds like the original owner dropped it, broke at least the peg, did a crappy repair, then traded it in. Being charitable, the dealer and the subsequent owner probably didn't notice the repair. I'm assuming it's the sort of thing you'd notice if you were really sharp-eyed or if you were looking for it.
I'll be getting the bike checked out by a Triumph dealer. When I know what that assessment is, I'll make a decision.
One more thing to add to the the pre-ride/pre-purchase checklist.

MMmmm being the owner of two triples now, both of which were insurance jobs after being dropped to the left, i think a close look is in order !!!
Sorry to hear ya foot copped a blow, pleased to hear ya stayed upright and lived to post it !
A girlfriend once asked " Why is it you seem to prefer to race, than spend time with me ?"
The answer was simple ! "I'll prolly get bored with racing too, once i've nailed it !"
Bowls can wait !
jebus! glad you're ok!
You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say will be quoted out of context, then used against you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks