Here's how a speed camera ticket is supposed to work.
1 Police send Infringement Notice.
2 If you don't do anything and the Police want to continue the proceedings they have to send a Reminder Notice with substantially the same particulars as the original notice.
3 If you don't either pay or request a hearing within 28 days the Reminder notice is lodged with the court as an unpaid fine. (The fine is for not paying the infringement fee, not for the original offence!).
A friend of mine had an Infringement Notice early February - to the address where the car is registered. Just about the time the Reminder Notice was due to sent a High Court judge pointed out that ALL the Police Reminder Notices were wrongly worded - so I assumed there would be a delay whilst it was sorted.
Wrong - a Notice of Fine turned up recently (remembering this can only follow from an unpaid Reminder Notice), to a totally different address - his mothers - which he hasn't used for ten years.
What's happened? Who has decided first of all not to send a Reminder Notice, and then to lodge it with the court as an unpaid fine with a different address. Someone is either totally incompetent or dishonest - and if the Police can get something as trivial as this completely wrong how can they be trusted with anything important?
In order to sort all this out it will be necessary to fill in Forms at the court, which takes time and effort - the only consolation is that done the right way the original fine won't need paying.
Whic brings me on to my second point - does anyone have a recent Reminder Notice? I want to see what changes the Police have made so it complies with the law. On the reverse will be "notes to defendant" - anyone tell me how the paragraph concerning how you request a hearing is worded?
Bookmarks