hahaha oh man i missed alot in this thread.
Koba - your going down the right path. Its the feel that will tell you the answer.
Ixion is also correct, the machines of today are more complex are require complex math behind them (which is why i recommenced that some reading was required).
I recently read however that its not the fact that devices are more complex now - its just that they are visual more complex than previous attempts. Its an interesting argument when you think about it - an interesting example i found was when i was doing my pre-apprentice stuff for panelbeating. I made a sill for an Austin A35 panelvan. This was super complicated as it involved 2 cones meeting a cylinder. My classmates took 1/4 of the time to make a sill for a 1984 Corolla hatch.
Another example would be to map heat transfer in cast non-pure iron of the old days and compare it to the heat transfer of the new titanium. So have the designs become more complicated or the science behind them? An interesting argument.
But basically to cut the science out if is quite simple. Braking like all mechanical things relies on the man machine interface. Or how i like to put it - The moron that pushes the buttons. Not even ABS can save a moron.
Reactor Online. Sensors Online. Weapons Online. All Systems Nominal.
Bookmarks